97c70 - 1y
Guys, I fixed global https://v.nostr.build/ZlKP.mov Of course, I also made it impossible for new people to find followers for people who use this feature. What should the default be for new users? I'm thinking 1 β enough to keep people safe, but a low enough bar to allow for discoverability.
Gigi @Gigi - 1y
π
"Safe" is an ok word in this case, since your point is exactly what this feature is trying to accomplish. It's web of trust, so that qualifier is user-defined. But yeah, good instinct for sure.
a363b - 1y
This looks nice. I'm missing global these days!
Our DBA is actually King Coracle, actually
Vitor Pamplona @Vitor Pamplona - 1y
How are you labeling the score? Is it a Nostr event as well?
Derek Ross @Derek Ross - 1y
nostr:npub1jlrs53pkdfjnts29kveljul2sm0actt6n8dxrrzqcersttvcuv3qdjynqn just implemented a user configurable WoT for global π nostr:nevent1qqszjqannxfj5yp2y775jd29jvtq5q7h3xyxwnvetgkdt2mr4jex2dcpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsygyhcu9ygdn2v56uz3dnx0uh865xmlwz675emfsccsxxguz6mx8rygpsgqqqqqqsvfdw2p
If it's a Nostr event, other clients could implement this πππ
I get what you're saying, however it's more than spam though. It's unwanted speech, though that's not the correct word in these examples. Safe is a better description here.
Not yet, it's in the next release
Ok, so maybe I oversold this, apparently nostr:nprofile1qqsy2ga7trfetvd3j65m3jptqw9k39wtq2mg85xz2w542p5dhg06e5qpz4mhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejqz9mhwden5te0dehhxarj9enx6apwwa5h5tnzd9aqz9rhwden5te0wfjkccte9ejxzmt4wvhxjmc70ca3s has had this in Iris since forever. Nevertheless, it feels like a big improvement to Coracle. nostr:nevent1qqszjqannxfj5yp2y775jd29jvtq5q7h3xyxwnvetgkdt2mr4jex2dcpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfdu2ymx9s
c80b5 - 1y
Maybe it could make sense to scale the default based on the number of follows a user has? Seems like there is some trade-off there
People are so used to hearing these terms used in a dystopian way it's hard to even talk about Nostr's paradigm. "Safe" is a subjective adjective, "unwanted" is a passive verb. The agent isn't specified, and around here it's not who it usually is.
daniele @dtonon - 1y
Yes, nostr:npub1g53mukxnjkcmr94fhryzkqutdz2ukq4ks0gvy5af25rgmwsl4ngq43drvk implemented it and it works great. It also provides a numerical preview of the expected network size, interesting data!
Yes. I don't use global now. I haven't for at least 6 montha or more it's a shit show. Implementing a WoT would allow people that want to turn this feature on be able to turn it on and use global once again. Don't like it because you want a full blown fire hose of everything in global? Then don't turn it on. This allows you to get what you want and allows me to get what I want. Win/win.
I guess it's somewhat hard to realize that not everyone wants to control you and some are legitimately trying to give control back to you.
It's more a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend. And so forth. A network of friends.
Right, but I don't think I would call it popularity, since that's independent of your standpoint. It's maybe closer to popularity within friend group, but a better word might be "alignment"
gzuuus @gzuuus - 1y
Thats nice!
Let's go with in-groupiness haha
That is in fact exactly what I'm doing lol
π
