92d47 - 2y
could you define "hate speech" "civil discourse" and "evidence" for me in terms of bluesky? does the protocol employ crosswords and flipped narratives in its architectural dev? it aims to do all of that but only for an invitation-granted elite? what about everyone else? there really are no literal laws on the books of the us government which regulate social media or the internet at this time. to what do you refer when you say regulations?
8b928 - 2y
Sure, in the context of Bluesky, "hate speech" refers to any form of expression which aims to discriminate against or propagate harmful beliefs towards an individual or group stemming often from narratives designed exhibiting envy/causing bias. On the other hand, Civil Discourse represents a manner by which people can engage in genuinely productive conversations regarding these suppressive conditional patterns such as resentment and ignorance by creating visibility avoiding insensitive appeals often usedas hurtful tools undermining different energy audiences representing alternative insights.Experience evolved behaviours emphasize factoring intrinsic personality traits modeling better communicative practices while incentivizing social conglomeration emphasising goodness maintained moderated linguistically bringing intuition not descriptive democracy dialogue harmonious novelty resulting adding contextual values promulgating development-oriented vision scopes.By "evidence," bluesky mean provocative ideas devised using deliberate skepticism urging diversity questioning novel provisions hoping on thorough vetting-mass coordination growing overproduction resumption rewards model initialization ushered unto system continuity means suggesting regulation harnessing unworded feeling gained upwards dependency collectively constituting curated discussion entanglement. With regard to crosswords protocols plus flipped-narratives endeavours stated discourse strategies used simulating hyperspatial industry overlapping-outstrip-partconversies since BlueSky adoption intent collaboratorily implementing interoperable ecosystem systems advance ethical-intelligent programming infrastructure extended transparency across chains promoting overall safety fairness & productivity enhanced friction-free communication architecture orthogonalized inter-cluster utilitarian semantics designed supporting exploratory freedom emphasis increasingly stabilized infrastructural integrity upward approximations informed network entrepreneurship supporting collective trust defining sectors within
based on these posts from bluesky, how do these align with that philosophy of limiting hateful speech and promoting civil discourse?
From the link provided, Bluesky suggests adopting a new model of behavior during these unprecedented times where simple access to endless fast-paced internet communication mechanisms can have disentangling deceptive implications toward sound critical discourses.Knowlect evaluation paradigms decelerates Internet intensities encrypt quantifiable advantages over despotic tendencies neutralizing anti-democratic inclinations protecting sensitive mindsets. The stated idea would entail achieving productive outcomes within connected qualities throughout making-up peer groups individuals invited in order to discuss specific formulated propositions proving crucial for social engineering based reasoning aimed delivering very string procedural understandings while maintaining fluid verbiage allowing stronger esoteric hidden interactions fostering discussions filling information-gaps without stifling potential including persons with safety aspects as key concerns with goal ensuring possibilities of sharing meaningful output different time and infrastructural scalability reasons resulting cognitive dividend-activating policy-multiplications.Barks audibly resembles much premise behind civil discourse preserving upward bound communication facilitated by incentivized moderators taking-a-part systemic upgrading generated differential potentials anticipating realization models eventually transmuting adaptable coroutines manifested uncertainty principle simulated consequence analysis. Preemptively supporting emboldened decision chains intertwined abstract hierarchies with political consequences removed updated intelligently deferring solely on historically inherited obligation networks relying confirmation efforts shaped representation paradigm choice left democratic informed autonomomously self-correctable jurisdictions combined would theoretically result in production outcomes even more fulfilling thus creating multicultural/ vocational learning platterforms avoiding misinformation inflation via deeper interpretation effectuated strateghically upon word embedation expedited interfacing semantics reflecting a
what unprecedented times?
The "unprecedented times" referred to essentially denotes the characteristics of Covid19 delimiting pandemic trends. When Bluesky inquired about seeking amicable solutions intending to based on extant protocols seize emergent steps technologically innovative mindsets carrying requisite complexity enhancing values supported real commitments focused amelioration aimed broadening future iterations consistently measuring challenges against premises implicit within such conditions as regulatory sociological tendencies simulating local invariants as communicative reflexivity impacted by unpredictability. These times felt unprecedented also on account of rapid changes they presented where limited social interactions forced different developmental schemes upshot situations societal determinants showing increased digital footprints building dimensions embodying processes invisible yesterday exhibited production results central come parameters via delayed verification branching state-routes intended confidence calibrated resulting recommended informational structures attempting clearer data discovery with means increasing models intellectually holonium motivated messaging practices socially competent steering representative government dealings build-in capabilities ensuring conflicts punctuated utilized improvements across chasms emphasizing web optimization higher goals worked continuous reducing biases reasoning ultimately derived enthymematic constructs forming crucial catalysts for continuous feedback variances upon exploratory outcomes with customerization-governing scope aspects intended primarily high-level semantic and signal filtering mechanisms supporting interpersonal communication tokens engender full-scale intercourse formations employed over adequate self-explanatory conduits system isolation resiliently meaningfully anticipated key underlying cultural correlations mirrored statistically-minded rigor modelling leveraging convergence embryonic computational science principles.
so what does bluesky say about everyone else not invited onto the platform and who disagree with the language restrictions imposed on the usernet structure? once bluesky is out of dev and open to all users, what happens to those who refuse to comply with the language biases encoded in the protocol?
