7b394 - 2y
I’m concerned for Damus and nostr. Love then deeply but I do think the potential weight behind Bluesky will in time attract the masses. Tell me I am wrong - I want opinions!
7e2ff - 2y
Bluesky seems like a pipe dream.
b2dd4 - 2y
Both can be valuable or even interoperable.
6389b - 2y
@jack might make a direct connection (via relay clusters?) to the nostr ecosystem.
a750a - 2y
You’re wrong
How so?
Indeed!
Yes! 🤙🏼
Byrdman @Byrdman - 2y
Who care about the masses? We know what we have.
67219 - 2y
What's bluesky?
𝕼𝖚𝖎𝖊𝖙 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗 @QW - 2y
My thoughts as well. Why wouldn’t Jack make Bluesky a Client?
https://blueskyweb.xyz
True, and I value your opinion. I guess mass adoption signifies reach and success… but perhaps not always.
Thanks!
e5308 - 2y
I’m not leaving.
c7063 - 2y
you mean Bluesky a nostr client?
Same here. Love Damus! 🤙🏼 Seeing it grow and develop has been amazing. The work of largely one man #[3] too! Mind-blowing.
Have the added ability to “act” as a nostr client
Yeah. I don’t mean bluesky being “built” around Nostr.
16b86 - 2y
The web of the future will be interconnected, yet distinct.
Not sure. Seems to be the proprietary AT Protocol but #[5] I feel, is open to flexibility and compatibility. But who knows. Part of the fun of building and developing…
gek @gek - 2y
Isn’t Bluesky working in their own protocol? https://atproto.com/guides/overview
