7b394 - 2y
Iβm concerned for Damus and nostr. Love then deeply but I do think the potential weight behind Bluesky will in time attract the masses. Tell me I am wrong - I want opinions!
7e2ff - 2y
Bluesky seems like a pipe dream.
b2dd4 - 2y
Both can be valuable or even interoperable.
6389b - 2y
@jack might make a direct connection (via relay clusters?) to the nostr ecosystem.
a750a - 2y
Youβre wrong
How so?
Indeed!
Yes! π€πΌ
Byrdman @Byrdman - 2y
Who care about the masses? We know what we have.
67219 - 2y
What's bluesky?
πΌππππ πππππππ @QW - 2y
My thoughts as well. Why wouldnβt Jack make Bluesky a Client?
https://blueskyweb.xyz
True, and I value your opinion. I guess mass adoption signifies reach and success⦠but perhaps not always.
Thanks!
e5308 - 2y
Iβm not leaving.
c7063 - 2y
you mean Bluesky a nostr client?
Same here. Love Damus! π€πΌ Seeing it grow and develop has been amazing. The work of largely one man #[3]β too! Mind-blowing.
Have the added ability to βactβ as a nostr client
Yeah. I donβt mean bluesky being βbuiltβ around Nostr.
16b86 - 2y
The web of the future will be interconnected, yet distinct.
Not sure. Seems to be the proprietary AT Protocol but #[5]β I feel, is open to flexibility and compatibility. But who knows. Part of the fun of building and developingβ¦
gek @gek - 2y
Isnβt Bluesky working in their own protocol? https://atproto.com/guides/overview
