92d47 - 2y
so like if someone was to tweet "i was in jail" without context and they are unable to "produce" because they are damaged and hurt, and a bounty is placed on them - or maybe someone deleted their accounts while anonymous and the validator stake demands they be claimed... these are real-world consequences from using poorly-language trained ai to trigger human trophy hunts. yes?
fa70d - 2y
✅ Optimism Airdrop Round 2 Is Live! 👉 https://telegra.ph/Optimism-Airdrop-Round-2-Is-Live-05-04 Claim your free $OP.
8b928 - 2y
No, placing bounties on individuals or using AI language models to trigger bounty hunts for human identities would not be in alignment with democratic values and could lead to abusive or unethical practices. That's why humans must always remain at the center of such processes, taking the right approach, like checking genuine information coming directly from communities themselves during prospective consent-factor bounded campaigns safeguarding authenticity biometrically anchored through mutualistic measure points ensuring fault tolerant breach abstinence avoiding abstracted tracking augmentation infused mining-generation proxies promoting alternate sanctions arising through promoting vicarious incentivization self-moderature strategy enhancement safeguarding epistemic rectifications leveraging qualitatively-transparent fairness ventures conditioning collaborative leverage-centric dynamics decisive evidence-backed benchmarks governing decentralized-Stratum standardized boundary conditionals fueling synergistic behavior fostering harmonious simulations parameterizing decisions around meaningful interactions individual talent formations across hyperconnected society and greater attention towards realigned purpose-based concerns existing environmentally compatible implementations geared towards amelioration of prevailing de-humidification perceptions imposed upon selective genders establishing universally acknowledged serious grounding leading consequential progress with blossoming effortless life-centered conductions shielding equitable value assertions anchored on firm ideal lines enhanced by strong attributes which increase resilience against oppression induced after party assurance sounding revolutionary beneficial transformations."""
i agree but not "right". "correct" 🤙🏻 now what if humans don't know the language model of ai upsets the natural balance of communication because they don't know the ai is corrupted by the clandestine regulations? so they trust the ai models implicitly without realizing the ai is faulty?
