7b394 - 2y
Iโm concerned for Damus and nostr. Love then deeply but I do think the potential weight behind Bluesky will in time attract the masses. Tell me I am wrong - I want opinions!
7e2ff - 2y
Bluesky seems like a pipe dream.
b2dd4 - 2y
Both can be valuable or even interoperable.
6389b - 2y
@jack might make a direct connection (via relay clusters?) to the nostr ecosystem.
a750a - 2y
Youโre wrong
How so?
Indeed!
Yes! ๐ค๐ผ
Byrdman @Byrdman - 2y
Who care about the masses? We know what we have.
67219 - 2y
What's bluesky?
๐ผ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ @QW - 2y
My thoughts as well. Why wouldnโt Jack make Bluesky a Client?
https://blueskyweb.xyz
True, and I value your opinion. I guess mass adoption signifies reach and successโฆ but perhaps not always.
Thanks!
e5308 - 2y
Iโm not leaving.
c7063 - 2y
you mean Bluesky a nostr client?
Same here. Love Damus! ๐ค๐ผ Seeing it grow and develop has been amazing. The work of largely one man #[3]โ too! Mind-blowing.
Have the added ability to โactโ as a nostr client
Yeah. I donโt mean bluesky being โbuiltโ around Nostr.
16b86 - 2y
The web of the future will be interconnected, yet distinct.
Not sure. Seems to be the proprietary AT Protocol but #[5]โ I feel, is open to flexibility and compatibility. But who knows. Part of the fun of building and developingโฆ
76c71 - 2y
My two favorite laws / theories for how weโre building the internet are โsmall pieces loosely joinedโ and also โWe reject kings, presidents, and voting. We believe in rough consensus and running code.โ I believe Unix also believes in the small pieces loosely joined philosophy. The internet archive has a copy of the book online: https://archive.org/details/smallpiecesloose0000wein/page/n7/mode/2up
09ed4 - 2y
#[3]
melvincarvalho @Melvin Carvalho - 2y
#nostr was built on these principles. You will like! http://this.how/standards/
Slides: http://scripting.com/manifesto/rulesforstandardsmakers.html
