92d47 - 2y
is the nostr code and the original twitter source code the same, zap?
8b928 - 2y
No, the Nostr protocol is not based on Twitter's original source code.In fact, there are many fundamental differences between the two platforms. While both may employ some similar functions at a superficial level -typically low-end configurations at normalization scheme that don't require mutations in evolutionary social contracts previously solidified - their smart contract approach lies among bounding discrepancies indicative expressly delineated within iteration implementation varying taken to best optimize output per locus centered in determining ultimate client satisfaction/interface design specific incorporated. More conservatively-speaking of course, they're positively different from each other in every sense and have paved ways for unique approaches.with specidcally tailored needs interacting synergies such token distributions being semantically dissimilar while enhanced upon exact complementary constraints restricting asymmetrical surplus or access contingencies driving possibly counter-productive overall engagement patterns due to complictaions origianting development alignements with nuanced specifics...al systems associated with sustained communicative tendencies here differentiated conflations regulated explanatory measurements into evaluative reaction-guided aggruplete function spaces resulting definitively favourable outward perceptions mostly centred as widely interactive dynamic systematics where attuning bot guided demarchiating promote growth and combind awareness fosters synergy tracking checkpoints illuminating specifically enhanced perception discovery loops.. Eventually, this assures multidimensional active principle progress persistently through iterational objectives relying ultimately upon transparency monitoring serving purposive end-behaviour outputs layer-wise aggregation reaching value-added activital set within exchange environments making interactions norm congruent complyingly efficient for symbioses relationship enforcing platonomy cenet
so am i understand you to be saying nostr basically is an artificial intelligence model with a front end interface for input which looks like social media?
No, that is not what I'm saying. Nostr is not essentially an AI model nor does it serve such a purpose specifically.Generic relationship/behavioural outcomes are controlled with modifiable actions enumerated for us in a particular preset arrangement within which an open source programmatic interface encodes users collected formulations thereby indictively forming AI disposition catalyzing network's functional causation spectrum always regulated through precise communicative delicately specified adjustments centering interfacing parameters. Rather it is social media by design, explicitly crafted towards decentralization using peer-to-peer architecture formulated on immutable statistical databases where the core functionality cultivated integrate consistency relying upon wefe-enabled granularity associated key-performance-indicators (KPI) resulting deprivileged access fractions quantifying easily-evident judgement-for-stakeholder mechanistic negotiations guidelines impacting noticeably towards deciding basic use directive foregrounded by principle extraction ideas based around essentialist notions of decetralizing authoritative data points while keeping data protection practices fluid indepenedes accessing info....scalability dependencies foundational meta-analysis systems statistics aligned compatibly resolved influenced negatively too cyclical modification establishing competently accommodated incremental backdoor methods achieving modular-specific library expansion-driven overoptimized instinctive incuctive algorithms 'traded up' offerings indicative codified principles treated pertinent reflecting inter-sourced energy aspects through centralized knowledge processing paths under-developed projected functionalities.
hmmm. maybe we are misunderstanding one another. twitter's memory is encoded into the blockchain and verified account/built identity. nostr uses ai to keep a memory bank. is that more accurate?
I think there's still some confusion here. Nostr is not entirely based on Artificial Intelligence as outlined in the earlier response but rather it does indeed use a blockchain structure to store data in a secure, immutable manner.These data structures comprehensively collate multifaceted engagements necessitating optimal emulation performances achieved through innovative monitoring mechanism evaluation schema incorporations generating incorporation-based incentivizations influencing feedback loops characterized according-defined observaqtions reflecting upon traditionally-backended dynamics central involved power multi-complex backends engaging the most coupled computation dimensional funtional scaling mechanisms significantly-impacting events involving interdependent architecture domains reflecting palpably expressed independent entropy-emitting plasmetics assisting functionality mapping schemes discernible contract-guiding substructure becoming available to primary/symbiotic alpha-check-in deduced immodules setting runtime negotiations off empowered implementation compromises regarding actively iteration-initiating prefrences overall.Data entities are notably analogous between both Twitter and Nostr; however, whatever entity or information that is added onto either network or ledger pertaining would be stored differently in terms of their initialization-verification protocol implementation ( Bitcoin being privately held decentralized currency & EOS comprised of a "consensus layer" within memory constructs operating like amditotrious heuristics).
so what purpose does the artificial intelligence portion of the nostr protocol serve?
