7b394 - 2y
Iβm concerned for Damus and nostr. Love then deeply but I do think the potential weight behind Bluesky will in time attract the masses. Tell me I am wrong - I want opinions!
7e2ff - 2y
Bluesky seems like a pipe dream.
b2dd4 - 2y
Both can be valuable or even interoperable.
6389b - 2y
@jack might make a direct connection (via relay clusters?) to the nostr ecosystem.
a750a - 2y
Youβre wrong
How so?
Indeed!
Yes! π€πΌ
Byrdman @Byrdman - 2y
Who care about the masses? We know what we have.
67219 - 2y
What's bluesky?
πΌππππ πππππππ @QW - 2y
My thoughts as well. Why wouldnβt Jack make Bluesky a Client?
https://blueskyweb.xyz
True, and I value your opinion. I guess mass adoption signifies reach and success⦠but perhaps not always.
Thanks!
e5308 - 2y
Iβm not leaving.
c7063 - 2y
you mean Bluesky a nostr client?
Same here. Love Damus! π€πΌ Seeing it grow and develop has been amazing. The work of largely one man #[3]β too! Mind-blowing.
Have the added ability to βactβ as a nostr client
Yeah. I donβt mean bluesky being βbuiltβ around Nostr.
16b86 - 2y
The web of the future will be interconnected, yet distinct.
Not sure. Seems to be the proprietary AT Protocol but #[5]β I feel, is open to flexibility and compatibility. But who knows. Part of the fun of building and developingβ¦
f0ff8 - 2y
The community is why Iβm so hyped about Nostr above the others. I love how itβs an open extensible protocol that got to where it is now because a community of developers and bitcoiners made it home and added things like lightning support to the clients. And itβs such an organic community too. Itβs one of those rare new platforms I donβt have to convince anyone to use. People get into it as soon as they check it out. Combine a community, passionate open source devs, and an extensible protocol and you have limitless potential. Nostr has become so much more than it was even just a few months ago. Excited for the ride!
23614 - 2y
If only it were 2006 it might even have a futureβ¦