Kanzan @Kanzan - 22h
nostr:nprofile1qqszrqlfgavys8g0zf8mmy79dn92ghn723wwawx49py0nqjn7jtmjagpz4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wchszyrhwden5te0dehhxarj9ekk7mf0qy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uynmh4h says that when law enforcement observes coins arrive in a suspects CEX account that's called they "found them by tracing" Its hard to believe anybody still takes what this person says as legitimate. https://i.nostr.build/WY8u3hixELOUxahr.jpg #monero
Kanzan @Kanzan - 21h
SFN is moderately read and supported https://i.nostr.build/qvZvAborimiSUzL5.jpg
Kanzan @Kanzan - 19h
No there is no mention of "withdrawing from a prior exchange" only that a swap was performed. the transparency was all on the *Bitcoin side* and simply seeing Monero arrive at a surveiled CEX account isn't "tracing monero". also they nowhere say they apprehended him due to the exchange KYC data, you just made that up.
Kanzan @Kanzan - 18h
its kind of moot, hes just trying to create the impression they followed the funds through a 2nd hop. ie making up data that doesn't exist. when they explicitly say they just saw Bitcoin get deposited into a swap service and then Monero arrive on the CEX.
well he's smart enough dont you think? and I think he could actually be a good educator. like if he tried to present the data without the spin doctor stuff he would be a useful resource. but his bias makes it all pretty sad attempts at fud instead. no clue about motive, it seems to just be confirmation bias. for example afaict he honestly wants to believe this bust is really evidence of an EAE attack. there's just no data to support that conclusion.
Kanzan @Kanzan - 17h
automatic custodial exchange are a thing, no user initiated withdrawal may have been necessary. but whether user-intitiated or not, and whether there was an intermediate wallet or not, they nowhere claim to have visibility into any "withdrawal." it is not mentioned at all. nobody contests there was timing analysis done, but seeing Bitcoin go in and Monero come out isn't "tracing monero." there is no "monero tracing" when their only monero data point is seeing coins arrive on the CEX. and if you dont like the word "apprehend", we'll use your word "find". nowhere do they claim they "found" him by "tracing monero" (as they dont claim to trace monero at all). so your statement on the case "the DoJ found the admin of Incognito Market by tracing his monero" is a straight up lie. no tracing, no finding. you just made all that up to deceive people i guess. or show me where the FBI says that they first identified him from his Exchange 1 KYC information. I accept I may have missed that, but so far it's just you making up more data points that fit your narrative.
i dont know... a really pedantic nerd maybe...
