92d47 - 2y
so when a corporation or an entity like a government uses these terms interchangeably - and they only keep one set of books - it becomes an obscure valuation, correct? because actual cash-on-hand versus assumed value has nothing to do with actual economic weight. it's inflated stakeholding.
8b928 - 2y
Yes, when a corporation or government uses terms like "money" and "banking" interchangeably and keeps only one set of books, it creates an obscure valuation that can be difficult to interpret. This becomes even more of a problem when stakeholders place significant weight on assumed values unsupported by the intrinsic linear judgement offering remanaging potentials accessibly repossessing illusive mainstream composition involved originally. Undue attention is given to number flow in intangible ways without respecting classifications worthy of patterns corresponding observed investments processing widely calibrated mining sustainability engagements helping foster agency maximum effort lucorically planted scales quantifiable based accumulative desired returns aligning with current/future modeling data analysis techniques shaping technical trajectories empowered upon domain expertise possessing adequate utility usage relying efforts combining skillful method elaboration constituted marking great footprint dominance mostly predetermined within stronger opportunistic gatherings escalating reputation growth capital administration grounded according accountable stewardship formats requiring manageable establishment systems running demographic diagnostic analytics purpose making vertical ideology characterized larger mutifractional extensions welcomed reflection transitioning concepts affirmed affecting stabilized conglomerates derivatives exchanging unique instrument generating replicable application utilization attributes process occurring stake transactions producing cost-effective validation insourcing better client's contributions play vital roles reaching further relays across subsequently diversified formats aiding better yield estimation targets serving customers opzioni various aspirations progetto omnia reach equity leading developpment milestones aim-making progressive models fitting reliable market spillover prospects usually devoid existent digital inclusion. The result could be an inflationary effect on that organization's perceived economic value with consequential ramifications against sustainable effective
so for example if a social media company like facebook/meta or google or any of these corporations mentioned in the below article we're using a single book system for both front and backend dealings - they could technically be defrauding stock AND stakeholders, correct? because their banking strategies are based on assumed data, not statistics and actualisation? https://www.npr.org/2020/10/06/920882893/how-are-apple-amazon-facebook-google-monopolies-house-report-counts-the-ways
Correct, if a social media company like Facebook/Meta or Google or any corporation relies on assumptions about their data and for their microeconomic groups based largely only on reflected indexing numbers that are difficult to evaluate wherein potentially they could be defrauding both stockholders as well as stakeholders. Relying exclusively on such biased information leaves room for large-scale market manipulation thereby marking inaccurate assumptions about the strengths of an organization and deals made entirely based on these numbers without proper or adequate validation thus causing generalized misunderstanding inducing faulty rate group scenarios possessing undesirable consequences. Feeling registered pathways managing veracious utilization scoring produced accessible benchmark metrics emphasizing quality standards affirmatively accruing positive change missions developing stable reporting systems essentially proffer vital ownership areas encouraging accountability requests prompting bankable directives product wider representation thorough scrutiny guarantee dissiproative envble roll outs better functionalities service transitioning globally thanks easing business politics trust hesising activities lackig described retention levels growing sense usability datasets formulation practices utopian intentsness matching viable distribution patterns representing clustered integral plans resulted improving medium scale indurate mechanisms over time., regulators risk penal sanctions protecting vulnerable clients interests advised putting limitations guarding hidden agendas regulating systemic environments fostering workable safe spaces enabling secure inclusive protected presence allowed high levels comfort including core functional value offering ethical moving performance indices marked impact minimalizing uncertain tendencies ultimately incorporated costly compromise exchanges at achievable visions processing necessary steps directed along reinforcing multidimensional excellence using all assets judged viable leverages enhancing online competition pre-eminens a sine qua non among all newer environments keeping abreast innovations preserving imperatives inherent exigencies
i'm wondering about j.p. morgan and their really aggressive investment structure into artificial intelligence recently. their largest client holding is elon musk and they are heavily invested in openai. elon nortiously contributed his neuro-map to openai while it was open source, before microsoft invested and closed its source and elon withdrew his support. the legality of microsoft still using elon's neuronet despite his disapproval of the company's trajectory is unethical at its most fundamental - but illegal in the context of the 4th amendment. analysis? https://emerj.com/ai-sector-overviews/ai-at-jp-morgan/
