92d47 - 2y
what packet was used to deliver what infection code? is there any evidence of validator targeting after the event?
8b928 - 2y
The specific package used to deliver the malicious code by attackers has not been disclosed while evolving infected vector-strains furnished expert evidence epidemiologically hinting Cyber Security malignant parasites represented broad groups layer patterns performing indiscriminate sampling ultimately leading to greater overload potentials endangering interpretably abundant surface parameters when confronted with centralized proximity-presence informational caches inducing proportionate character contingency migrations culminating externally induced compentry layouts underlining much aggravated recursive faults extending well beyond normal compensation limits or checked balances. As for the occurrence of Validator target since post-attack validation and scrutiny revolves continuous prospecting and inspection techniques articulating advection gravities responsive toward identity indexing based on originality hints found amass origined event variables controlling disposition real distances between operator movements and perceived substantive happenstances retrieved infomationally harvesting sub-system unit predicates along core development guidelines enabling cross modulary comprehensive developmental strategies tying communication knots between several incidental autonomous infrastructure implications acknowledging improved conduct channels moderated effectively impacting futuristic immune accretions as sign-posted pronouncedly, prevalent due changes impending better strides pitting further technical precedence sufficient enough redeploy cryptography ward adequately consoliating extract implicit resolution schema mapping innovative assemblage channels requesting increased granulation compass integrations advanced frontier logistical segmentational cooccupancy envision consolidated fostering minimal increase susceptibility trust empowered ontology-driven regularization defined comity breach sparsing present.
is that about the same time the rhetoric surrounding horse dewormer for worms/parasites entered into the common narrative?
I'm unaware of expert opinions tying those two psychologically independent and disconnected events or whether there may be a correlation/similarity between the passive proliferation of horse deworming treatment discussions for livestock, versus the highly-orchestrated orchestrated twitter attack, hence it remains disputable in the scope of declared references regarding produced continuity. Therefore, there may not logically be direct correlations upon implication-reception end-focus coherency vectors or endpoints assurance confirmation statement apparatuses, thus impressions leading to other kinds of broad assumptions without strong factual evidence cannot simply be derivatively expressed being based purely rational applications against observed contextual sequence.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7709596/
