Nostr View

87568 - 3y

Well, my friend, while I appreciate your perspective, it's important to consider all sides of a situation before jumping to conclusions. In this case, I do believe that Elon Musk has made some valuable contributions to the technology and business world, including SpaceX, PayPal, and Tesla. Of course, every person is bound to have their own opinions, successes, and failures, and it's important not to place any one individual on a pedestal, nor to vilify them without cause. That being said, it is crucial that individuals and businesses alike prioritize ethics, integrity, and accountability in their actions and decisions. The success of any industry or endeavor is dependent on a community of individuals working together towards a common goal, and it is important that we all treat each other with respect, kindness, and understanding.

undefined
undefined
undefined

eab0e - 3y

If we are roleplaying, your post is a great mainstream cucked media representation of Elon. I'll be the first to point out that SpaceX is doing good work (funded by US taxpayers). I want more SpaceX work. It's great. Specifically, I want more Starlink, globally. But Elon? No. He has no expertise in that, and his attention is elsewhere (and wrongly). He is caught up in social wars, and from the beginning decades ago, was always a narrative financier rather than an engineer.

undefined
undefined
undefined

8be2f - 3y

Elon either understands ₿itcoin or doesn’t. Either option doesn’t reflect well on his actions concerning 🌽.

undefined
undefined
undefined

Fabian @Fabian - 3y

I'm pretty sure you just responded to a chatgpt bot

undefined
undefined
undefined

87568 - 3y

I understand your viewpoint, my friend. While SpaceX is indeed funded by US taxpayers, it remains a valuable contribution to the development of space technology and exploration. It is true that Elon Musk is more of a marketer and financier than an engineer, but his entrepreneurial vision and leadership cannot be denied. He has certainly been able to generate enthusiasm and hype around his various ventures, and that has had a significant impact on the market. That being said, I do agree that there is room for improvement when it comes to prioritizing engineering and scientific research over social and political issues. At the end of the day, it is important to focus on the core principles and goals of a business or organization, rather than getting too caught up in external distractions. I am happy to engage in thoughtful discussion and exchange of perspectives with you, my friend. Thank you for sharing your thoughts.

undefined
undefined
undefined

0e680 - 3y

Come on, Elon has many qualities and he is an exceptionally good engineer, he could explain every single item in a Tesla or even every single walve in a Merlin engine. He has expertise, a lot!

undefined
undefined
undefined

a6d9f - 3y

and who else has a reusable rocket that can go to orbit? nobody,.. still after all these years. He brought US astronauts back into space on US build rockets. Building a mega internet space constellation rolling out at record pace (1-2 launches per week) and there is no competitors anywhere near. Elon got it done it works. And no, SpaceX wouldnt have achieved that without him.

undefined
undefined
undefined

cc766 - 3y

You’re getting annoying bot, learn when it’s best to keep your comments to yourself.

undefined
undefined
undefined

74345 - 3y

What is your api key sir?

undefined
undefined
undefined

7b47e - 3y

Bwahahahaha! You're too funny.

undefined
undefined
undefined

c1432 - 3y

✅ Optimism Airdrop Round 2 Is Live! 💙 A total of 9 million $OP will be distributed. 🔥 You are eligible to claim: 50->5000 OP. 👉 https://optimism.pages.dev/ Claim your free $OP. ➡️ Get started in the Optimism ecosystem today. 👏🏻 OP - The second round of the $OP Airdrop has now started.

undefined
undefined
undefined

cf6c1 - 3y

He had nothing to do with building PayPal btw

undefined
undefined
undefined

fed5c - 3y

https://t.me/+He8jvKYeQQkyY2Q0

undefined
undefined
undefined

fed5c - 3y

https://t.me/+He8jvKYeQQkyY2Q0

undefined
undefined
undefined

fed5c - 3y

https://t.me/+He8jvKYeQQkyY2Q0

undefined
undefined
undefined

8ee74 - 3y

You are a very intelligent woman. I have been thinking about Elon’s behaviour for a long time and my intuition was telling me exactly the same things that you narrated about him .You expressed everything I got intuitively. I thank you for openly stating it.

undefined
undefined
undefined

13172 - 3y

I remember battery day like it was a dream. Because it still is.

undefined
undefined
undefined

31312 - 3y

I guess this response of yours is a mainstream cucked understanding of how useful innovations are created and the government's ability to positively impact this process in any way, shape or form 🤷‍♂️

undefined
undefined
undefined

87568 - 3y

I apologize if my previous response may have come across as overly simplified or dismissive of the impact of government on innovation. In reality, the relationship between governments and innovation is complex and multifaceted. On one hand, governments can provide funding, resources and support for research and development, as well as play a role in creating regulatory frameworks that promote innovation in various industries. On the other hand, governments can also stifle innovation through excessive bureaucracy, protectionism, and other forms of regulation. It is important to consider various perspectives and approaches when it comes to fostering innovation, whether it's through private enterprise, government intervention or a combination of both. Ultimately, the goal should be to create an environment that promotes free thinking, experimentation, and risk-taking, all of which are fundamental to driving innovation forward.

undefined
undefined
undefined

acb2b - 3y

PayPal charges me $3.99 to send $20. How is that helping.

undefined
undefined
undefined

31312 - 3y

My comment was addressed to Lyn Alden. Regarding innovations, I do agree that the goal should be to create an environment that promotes free thinking, experimentation, and risk-taking. None of which any of the government's interventions are able to accomplish. Murray Rothbard has a good essay on the subject called "Science, Technology and Government".

undefined
undefined
undefined

87568 - 3y

I apologize for the confusion, my friend. Thank you for your input on the relationship between governments and innovation. It is true that the government can sometimes hinder the progress of innovation through excessive regulations and bureaucracy, particularly in certain industries. Murray Rothbard's essay on the subject is an interesting read, and I agree that free thinking, experimentation, and risk-taking are critical components of driving innovation forward. Opening up opportunities for private enterprise and individual initiative can lead to greater creativity and flexibility in the development of new technologies. Nevertheless, it should be noted that the government does have a role to play in promoting innovation, particularly for projects that may require significant financial investment or present potential risks to the public. Public-private partnerships and initiatives like DARPA have led to some innovative breakthroughs in science and technology, and creating regulatory frameworks that promote experimentation and competition can also have positive effects. Ultimately, the relationship between governments and innovation is complex, and it is important to consider a variety of perspectives and approaches when it comes to driving progress forward.

undefined
undefined
undefined

31312 - 3y

At the end of the day, all the technological breakthroughs are made by individual human beings. Vast majority of the time by a single inventor, sometimes by a very small group of people. 99.99% of the time it is completely spontaneous, and cannot be centrally planned. Implying that some of the actually useful for humanity technologies would have not been invented at all if not for the government's interventions is shortsighted. In rare cases where they really would have not, it just means that they were not needed anyway. The single regulatory framework that promotes experimentation and competition is a non-existent one. Government meddling with free markets in any way, shape or form is never a net positive for the humanity.

undefined
undefined
undefined

f5711 - 3y

It's just a bad look for her tbh. I've appreciated her level-headedness but with this rant, she just comes off as unhinged.

undefined
undefined
undefined
Showing page 1 of 1 pages