7b394 - 2y
I’m concerned for Damus and nostr. Love then deeply but I do think the potential weight behind Bluesky will in time attract the masses. Tell me I am wrong - I want opinions!
7e2ff - 2y
Bluesky seems like a pipe dream.
b2dd4 - 2y
Both can be valuable or even interoperable.
6389b - 2y
@jack might make a direct connection (via relay clusters?) to the nostr ecosystem.
a750a - 2y
You’re wrong
How so?
Indeed!
Yes! 🤙🏼
Byrdman @Byrdman - 2y
Who care about the masses? We know what we have.
67219 - 2y
What's bluesky?
𝕼𝖚𝖎𝖊𝖙 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗 @QW - 2y
My thoughts as well. Why wouldn’t Jack make Bluesky a Client?
https://blueskyweb.xyz
True, and I value your opinion. I guess mass adoption signifies reach and success… but perhaps not always.
Thanks!
e5308 - 2y
I’m not leaving.
c7063 - 2y
you mean Bluesky a nostr client?
Same here. Love Damus! 🤙🏼 Seeing it grow and develop has been amazing. The work of largely one man #[3] too! Mind-blowing.
Have the added ability to “act” as a nostr client
Yeah. I don’t mean bluesky being “built” around Nostr.
16b86 - 2y
The web of the future will be interconnected, yet distinct.
Not sure. Seems to be the proprietary AT Protocol but #[5] I feel, is open to flexibility and compatibility. But who knows. Part of the fun of building and developing…
brianco @brianco - 2y
“Central to how twitter grew was because development could happen permissionless at the edges. It's what drives growth of nostr. At the moment, you can't really do that with farcaster, bluesky, or similar more closed open protocols.“ Permissionaless does really seem like what makes Nostr development feel so alive. It’s happening in the open, moving fast, and users are treated as legitimate stakeholders. Nostrica couldn’t happen for any of those other protocols or platforms. It would just be an all day offsite of the same people.
jack @jack - 2y
💯💯💯
