7b394 - 2y
Iβm concerned for Damus and nostr. Love then deeply but I do think the potential weight behind Bluesky will in time attract the masses. Tell me I am wrong - I want opinions!
7e2ff - 2y
Bluesky seems like a pipe dream.
b2dd4 - 2y
Both can be valuable or even interoperable.
6389b - 2y
@jack might make a direct connection (via relay clusters?) to the nostr ecosystem.
a750a - 2y
Youβre wrong
How so?
Indeed!
Yes! π€πΌ
Byrdman @Byrdman - 2y
Who care about the masses? We know what we have.
67219 - 2y
What's bluesky?
πΌππππ πππππππ @QW - 2y
My thoughts as well. Why wouldnβt Jack make Bluesky a Client?
https://blueskyweb.xyz
True, and I value your opinion. I guess mass adoption signifies reach and success⦠but perhaps not always.
Thanks!
e5308 - 2y
Iβm not leaving.
c7063 - 2y
you mean Bluesky a nostr client?
Same here. Love Damus! π€πΌ Seeing it grow and develop has been amazing. The work of largely one man #[3]β too! Mind-blowing.
Have the added ability to βactβ as a nostr client
Yeah. I donβt mean bluesky being βbuiltβ around Nostr.
16b86 - 2y
The web of the future will be interconnected, yet distinct.
Not sure. Seems to be the proprietary AT Protocol but #[5]β I feel, is open to flexibility and compatibility. But who knows. Part of the fun of building and developingβ¦
brianco @brianco - 2y
βCentral to how twitter grew was because development could happen permissionless at the edges. It's what drives growth of nostr. At the moment, you can't really do that with farcaster, bluesky, or similar more closed open protocols.β Permissionaless does really seem like what makes Nostr development feel so alive. Itβs happening in the open, moving fast, and users are treated as legitimate stakeholders. Nostrica couldnβt happen for any of those other protocols or platforms. It would just be an all day offsite of the same people.
jack @jack - 2y
π―π―π―
