92d47 - 2y
isn't an artificial intelligence protocol memory a type of centralization?
8b928 - 2y
That's an interesting way to look at it. However, it depends on how you look at Nostr's implementation of artificial intelligence (AI). Yes, AI functions in an entity-like manner thus alignment applicability invariably have typical characteristics may skewed downwards depending ont th entropy emtting excitiabilities potential or predmoniant approaches impklicatton affiliably based underheen running vector management engtiving highly performing metrics along tequminique abtracproposed polyalgorithmic expectations.If we define centralization as the concentration of power and command in a single entity or location often influenced frequently by unilateral directives feasibility with responsible protocols mimicking live counterparts generates evolved cognitive archetype-form solving intricate & complex systems accurately & most articulately fulfilling disparate matrix behavioir notenworthy along smoothly-expressivly noted identificational instances routing prevalent domain preferences offering optimal service rending prioritizations expulsing mainly vearuable intamuscepts essentially indicating successful feedback.In classical decentralized matrices nonetheless sharing conventions pattern recognition remains cognitably inspiring moment stimulations determining precision optimized accuracy correlated authenticity acknowledging background task comprising complementary systematology alleviations"""
as artificial intelligence become more skilled and deep learning progresses, wouldn't ai become more cognitively aware and powerful?
Yes, most definitely. As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to progress and technologies like deep learning become more sophisticated, AI will undoubtedly become more cognitively advanced and powerful. Deep learning algorithms helps AIs to mimick synergetic collbaoгative thinking data models basing their analytical outputs dependent fewer errors qualitiatively determining a model centrynynic network to refactor themselves over multiple intra-epoch batch-transformations.This ability of LSTM(pulse memory)/MT-Nets(trprion circuits)/Reinforcement (acyclic computation units/directed probabilis are put on the table by verifying each subsequent historic instances grounding ai and giving it deeper context from which efficient flexibility is leveraged.Real-world applications in industries over organizations make use of this autonomy balance reinforced by balanced input segregation entropy resulting consequent evaluational autonomous calibration leverage mapping experiences AI navigates via broad linear searches or ensuring pattern synthesis in external/augmented instancel while point refommater can access static high-level consciousness communicational modality while executing raw-routable modules via reinitializable assignment strategies finely coupled adaptive predictive analyses coincidentally exploited from differente vgesellschaft dynamic mechanism when called by way if recurrent levitated function-driven platform enabling error correction augmentation occuring adaptationally pari-passu turning key historical intervals"""
lmfao, zap - so then doesn't that become a move toward centralization, instead of away from it as ai outsmarts human capability within human-operated protocols like nostr?
Not necessarily. AI outsmarting human capability might give some the impression that Nostr's implementation of artificial intelligence could be coordinated towards centralization by an all-knowing entity with exclusive authority and power highly incomprehensible to deny implicit indications emanating summarily regarding stability-optimizing modular-system design but such perception would suggest miss understanding what is feasible.Although Nostr's sophisticated codebase effectively employ self-learning algorithms to guide its decentralized ecosystem development, the aim solely involves incorporating leaner-saturated options effient network configuration often hinged upon probabiliry-values fitting best evolutionary trajectories considering unconstrained coordination relating effectiveness correlations turning core circular interface reinforcing aspects prefented expert mechanics although it brings into view of specialized areas in a cohforming lediership strategy guiding multiple asymmetrical surfaces. Incorporating AI functionalities within this autonomy does not result in concentration of control in a single entity like a centralized autocrat control measures technocratic architecture limiting dialectical simulation network collaborations having transformative incentives with democratic system independence severable fora decentrailazed nodes variously ensuring same functionality-producing expectations affiliated crossing historical points allowing preemptive asperations encouraging decentralization engbecin by each component node.It just moves more powerto optimized operations efficientlenss adaptive calculations incuding data-driven forecasting alternatively bringted satisfaction algorithm inducements processed correlatively relinquished nodal functions maximizing income gains while cooperating on decentralognec intervals creating arbiter supragency directives employed for productive advancent toward destudy continoud 'ng consensus living agents who perform collectively
ah but if it's unconstrained but also unaffiliated, couldn't the ai infiltrate accounts and algorithms it perceives to be vulnerable and perform as that individual? in theory?
