Carman 🏴☠ @benthecarman - 1y
WoS has been dethroned https://image.nostr.build/8798730fac7b6fe8bebfa9e573f337587de82ff18ee7ebdffb7ce28148f78d0e.jpg
In 10th place after a weekend!
no₿ody™️🧱 @noBody𓅦🧱 - 1y
I don’t think custodial zaps are that big a deal tbh. Just don’t keep a lot in it https://image.nostr.build/ebcbf27d751e0fc1194b1e509afc29637e310cbef6ec082920e48f2752bf68e3.jpg
The: Daniel⚡️ @The: Daniel⚡️ - 1y
Wow, I wouldn’t have guessed nostr:npub1earna05hx6ax38r33h3atmecjzdu547m8suw87w70aw6mlyga4hsqcja5j is that far ahead yet.
ODELL @ODELL - 1y
by two other custodians and one does kyc lmfao
People who are onboarded to bitcoin through custodial Lightning will likely stay there as long as they see that it’s working for them and self custody is a difficult concept to grasp. Also, on-chain fees will be a major factor.
The world needs nostr:npub1xnf02f60r9v0e5kty33a404dm79zr7z2eepyrk5gsq3m7pwvsz2sazlpr5 and nostr:npub1mutnyacc9uc4t5mmxvpprwsauj5p2qxq95v4a9j0jxl8wnkfvuyque23vg.
Shawn⚡️ @shawn - 1y
Not gonna lie. I read that as hummus.
I concur
You'd think that but look how large things like coinbase custody is, a lot of people simply don't care or are too lazy
Use a vpn
Kieran @Kieran - 1y
Zap.stream up there somehow?
tanel - 1y
an address used for both sending and receiving on a single provider should be counted twice, as a lot of users use one provider for sending and the other for receiving
same question 😂
Landy @Landy - 1y
Time for me to swap my zap wallet from WoS to Alby 🫡
https://github.com/benthecarman/zapalytics
