Nostr View

83e81 - 2y

To me, it is remarkable that: 1) Almost everyone on the planet seems to be “using/training” AI to make themselves more efficient without realizing that the improvement comes at the expense of their long term income. And 2) While doing so, they advocate/reinforce a monetary/political system that pushes prices higher through manipulated money. And 3) They fail to see the consequences of those 2 diametrically opposed paths. Shows how many people only think in only first order effects. #Bitcoin #Nostr

undefined
undefined
undefined

17538 - 2y

👀

undefined
undefined
undefined

5f496 - 2y

AMEN!!!!!

undefined
undefined
undefined

Aaron Daniel @Aaron Daniel - 2y

Boothian Jihad. 🤖⚔️

undefined
undefined
undefined

c7c8f - 2y

I need to get my children to understand this deeply. Thank you for your work 🙏🏼🙌

undefined
undefined
undefined

Jeff Swann @Jeff Swann - 2y

Use AI to be more productive, avoid taxes, & stack bitcoin. Kill the current system rather than feed it. #agorism #[0]

undefined
undefined
undefined

1bb21 - 2y

I understand the 1st point but not the 2nd point. How does it lead to the 2nd point?

undefined
undefined
undefined

b5dbd - 2y

Everything that exists is a self-reinforcing loop. It has to be or it would fizzle out, and not exist. We live in a world of ghosts, endlessly craving, never satisfied. They won't change, Bitcoin will just exert itself as a forcing function.

undefined
undefined
undefined

98a38 - 2y

AI appears to be a jet pack to your own intelligence and creativity. The smartest and most creative people will get out say 10x more than typical folks. For example, no need to hire a big tech team anymore. The three top developers in the company can now do the work 10 used to do. No need to dilute that equity. For the top entrepreneurs, creators and designers, I expect they will see a massive boost in their long term income.

undefined
undefined
undefined

7560e - 2y

I’m not sure I follow? If fewer people are employed because of AI, economic demand will fall and the economy will shrink. The economy is not merely about economic supply, if AI boosts our ability to produce things but reduces the flow of capital to consumers then it will lead to a smaller economy. Because in order to transact, any seller needs a buyer. In a capitalist system, it is the consumer who is the engine of the economy. Frivolous consumption and high monetary velocity consumers are the foundation of a strong economy. Strip those consumers of their buying power and you quickly grind to a standstill. It doesn’t matter what you can supply. It doesn’t matter if your productivity balloons, you cannot economically produce more than your consumers can consume.

undefined
undefined
undefined

8aef7 - 2y

It does lead to the 2 point, they are opposite, that's what Jeff is saying. 1) technology like AI,makes everyone more productive, so it makes everything cheaper. 2) The current fiat system demand everything to go up in price. This two points are opposite to each other, the fiat system is not sustainable bc technology is deflationary not inflationary.

undefined
undefined
undefined

ad1b1 - 2y

This is the current system. We are already 20-40x more efficient than people in the 1940s. The difference being we will soon me 100x more productive with no meaningful improvement to our lives. Your only option is to figure out how to benefit.

undefined
undefined
undefined

59cac - 2y

Agreed, but I’m having such a fun time with ChatGPT4 because it can understand what I’m saying so precisely. Open-source versions will be exciting, but I presume they will always lag behind until we hit Moore’s law for LLMs. Most people don’t understand the computer science behind attack vectors in distributed networks. It feels nice to finally have “someone” who understands again. Hard to resist that connection when most words fall on deaf ears. Humans want something they can use and tinker with, while AI wants to venture through your imagination with you — constructing the vision. I prefer the latter, but know it’s useless without the former.

undefined
undefined
undefined

7ca66 - 2y

People scrambling for lifeboats who don’t understand the predicament they’re in. Natural urge meets lack of education / critical thinking.

undefined
undefined
undefined

7c579 - 2y

Check out this Guitar Company's latest initiative. #[1]

undefined
undefined
undefined

83e81 - 2y

Unlikely they see it at that point. More likely that they take to the streets to advocate for more manipulation of money to “save”them

undefined
undefined
undefined

83e81 - 2y

🙏

undefined
undefined
undefined

8aef7 - 2y

I meant to say it *doesn't* lead to the second point.

undefined
undefined
undefined

59cac - 2y

AI being your only bouncing board doesn’t seem safe lol, but it’s a great pre-bouncing board.. helps nip bad ideas in the bud early on. I fed it my paper and it understood better than anyone on Twitter has — seems invaluable for open-source inventors.

undefined
undefined
undefined

697f1 - 2y

With the recent developments in LLMs it seems like your book was very timely. It’s happening very, very quickly, as you predicted it would.

undefined
undefined
undefined

Leo Fernevak @Leo Fernevak - 2y

I agree that people should converge on Bitcoin in order to have falling prices and counterbalance the inflation + manipulation, as well as providing property rights to all. Although I doubt point 1. Isn't it more likely that algorithms might steal our data against our will to use in its training? Personally I don't have a usecase for AI - yet. If I need tools I can generally write them myself and the human mind is more adapted toward creativity, plus, we can know that we have copyright to what we create when we don't use algorithms that use direct sampling data. I would feel terrible if something I generated via AI was created by someone else at a visible level.

undefined
undefined
undefined

7c579 - 2y

Jeff, would love to hear your thoughts on the article. It's a very interesting take on the future and being ahead of the curve and balancing technology WITH human craftsmanship. What stands out to you?

undefined
undefined
undefined

83e81 - 2y

Prices should fall as a result of the gains in productivity. They are only rising as a result of manipulation of money which is not the free market or capitalism. You’re measuring from within that system of manipulation. “GDP” should fall as prices fall to their marginal cost of production.

undefined
undefined
undefined

8aef7 - 2y

When central banks see that prices are not going up (inflation below 2%), guess what they will do? They will "incentivise" consumption by giving cheap money to everyone(low interest rates/money printer) so prices will be artificially pumped, not bc of economy, more demand, it's your money that has been devalued.

undefined
undefined
undefined

669df - 2y

Point 1 causes governments to need to print exponentially more to keep the current inflationary system going ( due to exponential technology growth being a deflationary force). People are using this deflationary technology to survive/make money in this same inflationary system, instead of exiting the system. This leads to reinforcement of the existing system /further manipulation of money (point 2) ironically and an exponential cycle of money printing against an exponentially deflationary force. Thank god for satoshi.

undefined
undefined
undefined

f76bd - 2y

Ai is non violent force multiplier.

undefined
undefined
undefined

matata @matata - 2y

do you mean on a macro level that ppl cannot produce more than ppl consume? as in it's measurable?

undefined
undefined
undefined
Showing page 1 of 5 pages