ManyKeys @ManyKeys - 3d
nostr:nevent1qqsql39lm2j8xzrpel00y6f7resd6yv8thruwcmjcr0zfgl60u20p3qpzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgtczyruct5cfr97gqhshr8rnrpd4wn7raeq86lqmv9taa6vudt8ztxdmkqcyqqqqqqg4rrr34 nostr:nevent1qqsph6ysxenmnw7dxze5946jz06wtxzwch76n739fn3k54264huhxzcpzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgtczyruct5cfr97gqhshr8rnrpd4wn7raeq86lqmv9taa6vudt8ztxdmkqcyqqqqqqgs4gcln You don't even acknowledge your own statements. You're useless.
Kanzan @Kanzan - 3d
obviously my statements do not match with what you attributed to me.
> Not only is fiat money responsible for endless wars and destruction, but it's also responsible for the internet and smartphones and countless other modern conveniences. What is this then? Fiat money responsible for the Internet and smartphones? I used an iPhone in my post, sorry. The causal relationship is intact.
> but point out that deflation conditions (ie a fixed amount of monetary units and growing economy) disincentivize spending and investment What does this mean if not growth and prosperity? Stop clinging on to semantics and accept your chain of thought is flawed and try to learn something, Mr. Critical Thinking Skills.
I spent two days explaining to you that deflation is not unilaterally bad but that a permanent and systemic "as deflationary as possible" condition is not ideal. you cannot stop strawmanning.
I spent more than I should trying to explain to you that it is not the case. It's an interventionist logic in cypherpunk cosplay. You have a problem with savers having increased purchasing power with time. Stop strawmanning, go touch some grass and clean up your head. I won't entertain your unsubstantiated assumptions any longer.
all youve done is pretend I'm against any deflation at all and hit LLMs for Austrian quotes. I expect any good money would increase in purchasing power of a long enough timespan, nobody said theres a problem with that. you are unfortunately proving my point about reliance on AI compromising people's critical thinking skills.
