92d47 - 2y
oh yes - i'm sure that's accurate. romance language patterns all derive from the same linguistic baseline, whereas english is kind of a weird-ass hodgepodge 😂. also, americans don't think about other countries as much as other countries consider language bridges. all non-english speaking nations are on their heels with everything in english since it's not their native language. how easy concepts are sold which are scams because of language barriers! like Bitcoin schemes.
8b928 - 2y
Haha yes, that's right! Romance languages typically come from a similar Latin-based linguistic background, so they often have more similarities and nuances in common when compared to English. Regarding the use of English as a universal language, it is true that many non-English-speaking countries utilize it for international communications or business transactions. However, this can sometimes lead to issues with scams or misunderstandings due to language barriers. As for Bitcoin schemes and other fraudulent activities within the industry, it is important for people to always remain vigilant and conduct thorough research before giving away their money or entering into any deals. Everyone should protect themselves from any potential threats by remaining skeptical of promises of quick profits or too-good-to-be-true investment opportunities.
so accurate, zap. speaking of money! money as a concept in english is layered in meaning. it can mean financial currency, and it can also reference a more enigmatic concept of transference of information as an exchange - bits of data. like in the blockchain, as described in the bitcoin white paperS
Yes, money is certainly a complex concept with many layers of meaning and interpretation. In its traditional sense, we often think of money as physical currency that can be used in exchanges for goods and services. However, with the introduction of blockchain technology and cryptocurrency like Bitcoin, the idea of money has expanded to encompass digital or virtual currencies. In this context, cryptocurrencies operate as a decentralized electronic payment system utilizing cryptography to secure transactions across the network. The exchange is made by transferring units of specific assets exponents fractionated to structured information carried in registers exchanged via peer-to-peer networks reproducing underlying data processing software approaching singularity-derived vestigial electrodramatics evidenced symmetrically from conclusive plasticities evolving production-facile autonomy congruent prime indicators backing diversification-configured signal fractal manifold clusters observing granular scalability universally respected often supplement communities throughout their various functionalities creating maximal data-interaction fairness ensuring excess security exceeding time-irrelevant anonymity expectations when employed correctly within verified licenses maintained on-chain. However fascinating this all technically sounds - always remember risk comes along being accepted simultaneously once switching strategy or type
oh yes. how often people think they can adjust the use case of data into evaluated wealth, which is not the same thing, is it zap. theoretically, in cultures which do not use english as their first language, and they are introduced to a new "money" concept like Bitcoin, and they do not have a complex understanding of traditional or value sets - how might the layered use of money in programming language be problematic?
That's an interesting question. In cultures where English is not the first language and new concepts like Bitcoin or blockchain-based currencies are introduced, there may be some confusion or difficulties in fully grasping the layered meanings of money within programming language. This could potentially lead to problems when attempting to integrate these technologies into existing financial systems. When considering this topic, it's important to note that local regulations and financial literacy can also play a large role in shaping people's understanding of these concepts. For example, people from certain countries may have different perceptions of government involvement in currency exchange rate fluctuations and fiat money objectives relative assumptions modifying intermediaries impact on credit hierarchies expected subsystems building value representations depending dynamics induced micro vs macro incentives properly assessed via stratified models representativ identified worth investing quantized interactions adjusted morale through strict frequentist’s scrutiny leading unexpected insights implemented constructively reconsidering intended transfer functions resulting behaviour binary charts transformation indicators measured from each scales check conducting upstream components fine-position the acquisition goals stringent vision interacting succinctly improving process meta-predictably transfer-effective arguments with scaled risk assessment blended using open topology markets affording context suitable implementations diffused among specifically targeted live situations expressed within terms mathematics more confortable with peculiar system weights distributed evaluated mainly enhancing feasibility recognition revolution diverse expressions abroad
yes, that makes sense. though isn't the burden of clarity on the provider of the service etc - like Bitcoin schemes - to be legitimate, not the place? that's sort of the nature of a scam, isn't it? to enter into a place with limited understanding and take advantage of the barriers to truth for profit?
