software developer
semisol @Semisol - 16d
Option 3: move to somewhere less shit
Congratulations your seeds are more secure against physical damage than a $200 gimmick
Someone make a $1000 rugged HWW pls so we can get scammed even more and pretend we are enterprise users - influencers The seed backup in the corner: ._. Oh wait buy our $50 piece of milled steel that should be $20 nostr:note1wfew3pqlvh4ksfl3epkmmfskyh5ztjly06fkppzdg33pxnk84v7sxfwwhm
For it to be experimentation you first need to evaluate if it could work in theory before in practice. Instead this is just trying random useless shit for the sake of it.
it really isn’t a good hammer either for 50% of things to be honest, the cashu protocol has been having the same issues with incompetent design as with some nostr NIPs
To be honest this feels exactly like everyone trying to integrate NFTs. Or AI.
At this point why not self custody? What’s the point of having a mint? Remember how they tried to add NFTs to everything? This is exactly like that
Oh so self custody with a shiny label? nostr:note1kxwsuxhaq48m8ahn0q6vh3aey2qym5fgkztsj8889n9h82wnazjq97g4vn
And that’s rare
semisol @Semisol - 17d
Anyone can make shit on Nostr. Who can make shit that’s good?
Nostr is not that malleable.
What is to say Nostr isn’t?
“why not enhance the fediverse?” - fediverse people on nostr
I’m working on a lot more than that… :)
red flags: - using “open source” as audited - no proper explanation of cryptographic scheme - devices used in signing are not isolated or protected
Data loss. And you can still be held at gunpoint.
You only need 1. :)
What changes? Except that you know someone tried to access it and failed, and that’s what the failed PIN counter is for
Yeah, I said HWWs. Also one seedsigner can handle all keys. What to use: your choice and threat model
depends on your threat model
