https://walletscrutiny.com https://nostr.info Working on Bitcoin, Nostr and being a good dad.
Leo Wandersleb @LeoWandersleb - 22d
Please participate in this poll over on Xitter! https://x.com/rot13maxi/status/1992778672290370035
Somebody into bitcoin +10 years isn't necessarily more knowledgeable than later classes but +10 years of being consistent with what I value in Bitcoin does gain my trust no outsider's technical insights can.
Leo Wandersleb @LeoWandersleb - 23d
Nothing wrong with direct-to-relay payments. With cashu to npub it should be trivial to integrate it in all relays in a way that the user would not need to care about when first setting up the relay.
Then miners can spam relays for almost free? 🤷 Miners could sell that capability ... Anyway, I'm sure you can do better. Use Cashu to reward the first m of n relay operators in a transparent way. I assume, mints can execute arbitrarily complex logic so it should be no problem to have a way to reward the first 5 of enumerated 15 relays for picking up a note. People would have to track if the relays take the money but delete the reward or if they retain the event for a reasonable amount of time but this way at least the relays would get directly rewarded for building the infrastructure. To avoid centralization, we would need ways to spread the load, favoring less central relays but with the outbox model, people already can use their own relays and have little benefit of using centralized ones. nostr:npub12rv5lskctqxxs2c8rf2zlzc7xx3qpvzs3w4etgemauy9thegr43sf485vg
Leo Wandersleb @LeoWandersleb - 24d
No. My influencer of choice said hodl.
At WalletScrutiny I want to establish something similar. Attestations to have tried to reproduced binaries. "I tried for 4h and failed" is a data point just like your "I tried to find weaknesses for 2h but it looked ok". That's far far better than no external statements at all and I hope to standardize this on nostr. nostr:npub1qw6sxmwrmwpxqsc8cxty62ujvst6j8pmz8hhtwnv54gpn6dh5c4qms4882
Right? These were probably not sending time signals to triangulate based on timestamps but still, it's kind of obvious to do this.
Leo Wandersleb @LeoWandersleb - 4mo
I wonder if there is any actual use of it beyond people trying it out.
I see "openAI perhaps" but on your website you attribute it clearly to openAI at https://api.ppq.ai/models https://npub1gm7tuvr9atc6u7q3gevjfeyfyvmrlul4y67k7u7hcxztz67ceexs078rf6.blossom.band/9df32d6f36a49a283e460354e4116475789cc91830ff76012972906be8c11eab.png How do you not know? What would be the api endpoint to try it out without going through ppq? I'm having size issues. Some 403819 bytes queries run into issues with this and other models that should support a million tokens.
How is that api holding up? How many of your users are paying to use inferior models right now?
If you are #vibeCoding give horizon-beta a try. It is free, fast and top quality! I've been using it via the ppq API massively and I can't believe it's for free. Why would not everybody use it right now? https://npub1gm7tuvr9atc6u7q3gevjfeyfyvmrlul4y67k7u7hcxztz67ceexs078rf6.blossom.band/75add38d928e4fb116749a7cd23c6506214d3168c2a31800716b005991dd0cac.png nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzp53tekcay5zmcps0vk5xe40jq5ewche7g8qx4657mtpe76a8dltwqy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq3wamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwwpexjmtpdshxuet59uqzqdzglwj4rw6ms7n2aj9l3rsa8k7rfyf77exe3a2pc0dqflxfgqn4evt0u4
nostr:npub1hyvh5n8062s3ezvyqmhjmzflr9l20sg647mx4urn7npx0zug50yqt3rtnu appropriated part of the headline by repeating it and adding own interpretation calling Hamas "terrorists" so unless you disagree with the classification of Hamas as terrorists, what's wrong about what War Monitor said? The photo though ... blame New York Post.
Leo Wandersleb @LeoWandersleb - 5mo
So there is a picture of the explosion that looks like either two explosions or an explosion under the bridge (planted device) but the governor knows a device was dropped on the bridge? I'm confused. Who took the picture of the explosion?
There is much to explore in detail but to answer your questions: If they mention me, client could check if they have followers in that thread or if my follows follow them. This should be cheap to do relay wise as the client could load the follows list with each profile it sees. More involved checks would be replies in the last hour, age of the account etc. but I would like to get these posts not hidden but marked as potential spam at a certain threshold and hidden at another. This way, new accounts still get a chance to get discovered but I'm very conservative when reading notes from people with zero followers I know. Bots will just drown us with engaging content and no relay can protect you from that.
Couldn't find an older map? With the sources quoted from more than 20 years ago I'm not sure the coloring has any relevance to what's going on there today.
I "allow" for other policies but I don't want to support them. I want to support the commoditization of nostr relays and relays that cannot easily be cloned are a concern to me. If people use relay X because people use relay X, there is a problem. We have to get away from this kind of server-centric network effect. "Just use relay X and people will see your posts" would be very bad for nostr. To your other questions, the exact design of actual pay per use is very under-explored but I would pay "my" relay to serve my notes to my followers and relay operators would probably design some fair-use rules that wouldn't prevent people from reading recent posts but in a future where all are used to automatically paying mSats as they browse the web, they probably wouldn't mind paying the equivalent of $0.002 to load their timeline from such relays. I don't see how spam would be related. For me, nostr is censorship resistant, so ideally it allows all to broadcast whatever, so the recipient already has to filter and the relay is only charging for the infrastructure, not for sorting out what's spam and what not. Currently, curation is mixed with relays but it should be split to reduce centralization risks.
We will see how that goes. Are clients aware of such migrations? Do they by default store all the events to re-publish later?
Paying a relay is the most basic requirement for it to become incentive aligned other than controlling who can use it "for free". My vision is that people will offer relays that charge per use. These relays would have to measure use and as storing an event begs the question, for how long it will be stored, it's obviously not trivial to put a number to each use of a relay but I suspect that the long term most viable relays will be those that offer the lowest price for the highest value and my hope is that it will be a commodity and not just a bunch of premium relays nobody understands how to compare.
He's playing the Twitter playbook and I hope it doesn't work like that on nostr. Here, he cannot just block those who spread these facts about him to avoid his followers from ever hearing about what he does.
Anyone that is not Amazon cause Amazon is already too powerful. I ordered 50 times from fasttech and started because they accepted Bitcoin and shipped to Chile. I'd happily give my business to something similar. That said, for Hyperbitcoinization, Amazon would be the one I'd pick.
