https://walletscrutiny.com https://nostr.info Working on Bitcoin, Nostr and being a good dad.
Leo Wandersleb @LeoWandersleb - 1mo
I think a lot is kind of muscle memory. You can't put it into words for reproduction but still you can study it in words. I imagine that humanoid robots will quickly gain street smarts like autonomous cars are learning the unwritten rules of human interaction. The latter probably do so very explicitly, with engineers approving changes to how the car should behave that were not clear before actually getting into the street. I wonder what Tesla knows about how people expect you to drive according to your location. They must have hard data where humans only have anecdotes.
How many weeks do you want to spend doing this? With how many lawyers reading in parallel?
I tried the "forgot my unlock pattern" puzzle. Not recommended. Very anxiety inducing. ⭐1/5 The game comes with incomplete instructions. Knowing the rules upfront would have improved the fun part.
It's annoying and genius. Some users will hate it but might have started using the app because they heard it work from total strangers before.
Do you know who owns all the bitcoins? 10 million were mined in the first 4 years, so they did certainly not accumulate 10 by the time Satoshi left but by now? Are Bitcoins accounted for to a degree that would not leave 10 million to some government agency that bought it via thousands of accounts on exchanges over the years, whenever a pump was desired for their narrative? I'm not saying this is what went down but if that were what went down then yes, it would matter a lot.
Would it matter if the NSA had invented Bitcoin? Absolutely. The revelation that "Patoshi" might actually be "NSAtoshi" - not just holding 1 million coins, but an additional 9 million - would shift the entire narrative. It would suggest that Bitcoin’s early growth was an orchestrated effort, not an organic revolution. A vast wealth accumulation strategy in a world where the dollar is dying. If the NSA had such a head start, our discussions about decentralization and governance would suddenly seem hollow. The slow awakening of nation-states to Bitcoin’s potential could have been a well-crafted story, designed to mislead us into believing we had control. The collective agency we thought we shared? An illusion. Whether Bitcoin was a spontaneous creation by a lone cypherpunk or a long-term operation by an intelligence agency to prolong US dominance is no trivial matter. It changes everything.
Not exactly. Git is more than just github. Git is great for incremental changes, each with a commitment to the full history of the repository. If you know the ID of commit 200 and somebody is offering you a copy with 205 commits, you can immediately check all up to 200.
I'm curious for your thoughts on this: Whenever an app offers integrated TOR support, I would not trust it to use it for all requests as I had worked for a product that had introduced TOR but then forgot about maintaining it, so new devs connected to new servers forgetting about TOR. Using TOR to completely proxy all traffic for an app should strictly provide more reliable privacy ... unless that doesn't play well with integrated TOR support which might choose a new circuit under certain conditions which the proxy cannot know when to do.
My immediate thought, too. On the other hand, nostr is great for async processing. Once the events are in cache, network delay or bandwidth simply don't matter anymore.
My excitement about that headline clearly dropped with that last word 🤣 What a click bait strategy.
Sarcasm is such a waste of everybody's time ...
Your argument works great on micro plastics: if it doesn't decompose in hundreds of years, basically being inert, why would it harm to have some mg of it in my body? For fiber though I think there is a case to be made that it increases the volume of what reaches your lower intestines and I think there is scientific evidence it lowers colesterol. Clearly it's not its chemical properties but its mechanical properties.
I hated the "Bitcoin Foundation" with a passion but my memory now fails me as to in which way they made the claim about Satoshi being involved. I think they had him listed but publicly said it was implicitly clear that Satoshi would support their nobel cause.
BTC @$1?
No. Roger is many things but not that stupid. "ICO" wasn't even a term back then and he was figuratively speaking as Satoshi did contact Adam Back to join in earlier than he did in the end.
Yes, primal is my choice for searching people. But only for that. All other clients, noStrudel included appear to lack there.
Snort was my daily driver but somehow it screwed up along the way. Last time I checked, it did not load many of the notes I had on noStrudel.
Can you please give me not a lot of money?
Not sure. Maybe. I might sponsor somebody to set it up and maintain it.
If you want to use the service you would have to create your key from 3 keys I think. I don't think you can split the key if you started single-key.
