2b196 - 2y
#[0] 👀
Artur @Artur - 2y
Is there a new verification method? How come we don’t see a domain. For example, I noticed Jack’s account doesn’t show CashApp anymore.
jack @jack - 2y
I took off my NIP5. I don’t know. I just don’t think it’s the right and accessible solution for individuals. Great for orgs and companies tho. I don’t have another idea at the moment. Best way you know it’s me atm is my pubkey which was posted to my Twitter account. Drafting off 17 years there.
496d3 - 2y
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWys3do-An0
brianco @brianco - 2y
Keep reposting puns, we’ll know it’s you.
e4a1d - 2y
Welcome back, jack!
🫂
d7f41 - 2y
NIP5 is a great solution to prevent being scammed by fake accounts. Especially if the only way to verify pubkeys is to find it on a centralized and competing app. I like that domains are being used as a tool for verification on bluesky too.
329d2 - 2y
Yea NIP5 does not make sense for people that don’t own domains which is a large share of the public…whoever solves a decentralized identity protocol that anyone can use and does not involve scanning your eyeballs will have something big
0b39c - 2y
All I know is that It was the best feeling in the world adding the nostr.report NIP05 to the entire #[6] team. I personally think that a lot individuals in the future will have their own domain, but even if not, what we really need is to understand someone’s reputation, not identification.
It still has a dependency on ICANN
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gquZ01Yrhzg
17538 - 2y
Any thoughts on nip-05 substitute for those without a twitter who join nostr?
cc766 - 2y
NIP05 is overrated anyways. Mainly because it can’t use the bitcoin ₿ !! Either the content being posted is worth following, or someone like you is genuinely interacting. “Verification” is lame all around.
7bdef - 2y
damn near everything has a dependency on ICANN if its on the Internet because they control the DNS. I do think NIP-05 can provide value for individuals but I agree it’s fundamentally broken. what are your thoughts on some of the emerging web of trust experiments on nostr? could this be a viable solution?
I don’t have a great idea unfortunately. Considering. Built reputation is king ultimately tho.
feb4e - 2y
I like nip-05 from a tribal standpoint. I have several nip-05s, both my own and groups I belong to. It’s a pretty platonic way to identify.
Just got my #nodestrich nip-05 today🤙
b481d - 2y
In a decentralized network all users need to have a fair, straightforward way to keep their own credentials. Delegating credentials arguably got us in the current structural messes in the first place.
やトナ @やトナ - 2y
Yeah but only if someone has their own domain or is part of a company that has one. Otherwise, anyone could hop on a NIP05 provider site and create an account impersonating someone who doesn’t have their own domain.
If it contains an “@“, it has to go.
I)ruid @I)ruid - 2y
I need to write this up as a NIP and submit a pull request, but how about: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PoU_nweF4kXSmgZuy9uIpirSk2BRaeZEGluPoKYt6aY/edit?usp=drivesdk
This is a great idea.
