7e83d - 3y
#[0] makes it obvious that clients need a mute function per thread/note, otherwise content shock will be near. #[1] & #[2]
Otherwise we have to stay at the manual level and ask users to not respond to overwhelming thread like #[5] does here. And what users do is like the note from #[5] with his request for silence. 🤦
#[5] : Thank you for making an important client flaw obvious with your wonderful #[1] . 🧡
49bcc - 3y
that's what i call a free speech paradox. we all need filters, but it's good to have the control on nostr
Ryan @Ryan - 3y
Have been noticing this last couple days. UI things like collapsing the list of usernames would be nice as well, sometimes taking 1/3 of the screen.
semisol @semisol - 3y
I would want a way to @ someone without sending them a notification. If I could do that then I would (except for the first zap they receive).
An "I'm out" button.
@zappr silent
This could be a new boolean field in the note like silent = true (on the note level). Or would you like to have it per mention in a note like silent = {pubkeys}? Or do you think of something completely different?
I wanted to Zap you for this post. But you don't have a LN address set in your profile. 😟 See here how to get going with Nip-57 Zaps: note1lclyv0qwplty97fn4u0k5ns7w0uw8u7tswsa42lrsa2hajqdwmzskm690v
64568 - 3y
Yep, it's a problem even for me at user level, we need to redefine a little the note options, maybe I'll add something about it
Thanks I am still researhing aspects of lightning before I jump in and run a funded node. I set up a LND address. I heard, differently to running a bitcoin node, some skill is needed to run a good lightning node @darthcoin
Thanks, anonymity is king.
For context, here's a discussion about the mute function on client level going on: #[1]
#[6] has set out a bounty for Amethyst which is at 60k currently: #[1] I've opened a feature request as github issue to reflect this: https://github.com/vitorpamplona/amethyst/issues/161
