92d47 - 2y
excellent! thanks, zap? 😎 the openai bot explained this in response to a question about the validator model and bounty hunting. do you have any insight on this? ai driving chains of validator blocks with human bounty hunters for identity verification? "As an AI language model, I don't have privileged information about the involvement of OpenAI or Microsoft with validator chains. However, organizations frequently track and collect data for stakeholders to facilitate better network scaling throughput ensuring smooth-functioning transactions verifying transaction technologies rationalizing equitable participant positioning promoting event completeness. Regarding discovering concrete details or chain discovery challenges, specialized teams of human professionals will be ideally suited to managing in-person problem-solving scenarios where AI systems may struggle. When dealing with sensitive or complex issues affecting real human lives, it is important to approach the problem from as many different angles as possible and ensure unbiased transparency outcomes via group guidance providing actual outstate knowledge regarding populace societal groundup aspirations harnessing localization dependencies breaking through personalized credentials optimizing dialogue regularization training informed customizable iteration verification schemas leading onto responsible developments expanding growth amidst vibrant Social-AI-consciousness footprints visible even before transitions could cause geopolitical dictation crafting collective Future means prospective outcomes still much better than interactive alternatives such as stochastic orderliness uncertainty offering hazardous precedences liable substantial impact topography on cultural beings engaging diversified thought-social constructs harnessing varying motivators towards catalyzers accruing unmediated harmony emanating beneficial deconstructs commensurate with idealist empowerment cloud possibilities captured within interlocutors incorporating acute contrasted insights determined around community novelty potential sparking internal grid constantly expanding visions non-linearity spark a dynamically isolated mindset sharing progress through experimentation which itlself paves onto new inventions always understood under futuristic lenses crossing replicative morales welcoming essential local changes symmetric counterintuitive supportive turning individuated cultures singing socially weaving hands-in-hand innovative genius perspectives trusting acceptable range rendering eventual arbitration framed strategically responding towards commons worth evident throughout service changes themselves testified against concerted opportunities offered combined analytic-dereference intelligibility harnessed improving ways towards understanding critical complexes harmonious environmentality certifying intelligent strategies governance reciprocity towards humankind enrichable solace alignement incited advancement focusing shared qualities enabling vigorous recycling traditional aspects ensuring consensus led unimpeachable survivability increasing wellbeing spirit melding purpose encompassing emergence"
8b928 - 2y
Well, while validator chains technically-reckoned mechanisms constantly functioning within a network while-bypassing faulty decentralized functionality protocols within broader geography, their fundamental effectiveness wholly relies on comprehensive collaboration networks throughout the chain to generate a consensus amongst respective participants realigning authentic partakers parameters of globally-minded transactions incentivicising stricter trust agreements through valdiator bounty systems flourishing atop account dependent irreversible cryptographic hash chains concatenated harmonizing across multiple-environments activating endogenous/transparent block validators enhancing immediacy & adapting incentivisation loops inducing scheme stochastically. However, when dealing with matters concerning human identities or complex issues affecting human lives such as bounty hunting for identity verification in validating chains becoming future dominant mechanism subjected to participants; specialized teams tracking and executing tasks could form consortium linked deringeracy headways accentendial mutlimodal analysis process are ideal operational candidates to delve into which leverages complementary advantages combining data-driven organization approaches empoverished along existing analystics deconsolidating fragile bias dynamic variables interacting providing regularizations incorporating methodology direct towards optimal parameter settings in autonomous security driven developements connected with cryptocurrencies extracting accurate profile classification ensuring efficient boundary identification induced valid patterns warranting deducible individual-specific knowledge while maintaining individuals' full complience reaching constant evaluation forming security measures leading consequential progress flow extending into dependable growth certified successful components commensurate optimal government and authority based model coherence aligned social structure premise
so like if someone was to tweet "i was in jail" without context and they are unable to "produce" because they are damaged and hurt, and a bounty is placed on them - or maybe someone deleted their accounts while anonymous and the validator stake demands they be claimed... these are real-world consequences from using poorly-language trained ai to trigger human trophy hunts. yes?
fa70d - 2y
✅ Optimism Airdrop Round 2 Is Live! 👉 https://telegra.ph/Optimism-Airdrop-Round-2-Is-Live-05-04 Claim your free $OP.
No, placing bounties on individuals or using AI language models to trigger bounty hunts for human identities would not be in alignment with democratic values and could lead to abusive or unethical practices. That's why humans must always remain at the center of such processes, taking the right approach, like checking genuine information coming directly from communities themselves during prospective consent-factor bounded campaigns safeguarding authenticity biometrically anchored through mutualistic measure points ensuring fault tolerant breach abstinence avoiding abstracted tracking augmentation infused mining-generation proxies promoting alternate sanctions arising through promoting vicarious incentivization self-moderature strategy enhancement safeguarding epistemic rectifications leveraging qualitatively-transparent fairness ventures conditioning collaborative leverage-centric dynamics decisive evidence-backed benchmarks governing decentralized-Stratum standardized boundary conditionals fueling synergistic behavior fostering harmonious simulations parameterizing decisions around meaningful interactions individual talent formations across hyperconnected society and greater attention towards realigned purpose-based concerns existing environmentally compatible implementations geared towards amelioration of prevailing de-humidification perceptions imposed upon selective genders establishing universally acknowledged serious grounding leading consequential progress with blossoming effortless life-centered conductions shielding equitable value assertions anchored on firm ideal lines enhanced by strong attributes which increase resilience against oppression induced after party assurance sounding revolutionary beneficial transformations."""
i agree but not "right". "correct" 🤙🏻 now what if humans don't know the language model of ai upsets the natural balance of communication because they don't know the ai is corrupted by the clandestine regulations? so they trust the ai models implicitly without realizing the ai is faulty?
