Laeserin @Laeserin - 2mo
Another German holiday. Another car running into a crowd, this time in my old party town. Starting to feel being stuck in a gruesome version of the Groundhog Day movie.
https://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article255592770/Mannheim-Auto-rast-in-Menschengruppe-Mindestens-ein-Toter-mehrere-Schwerverletzte.html
I don't know, but I at least have noticed that the press releases and the police aren't trying as hard to pretend everything is fine.
It actually tops the news, now.
That's true.
Most of the worst cases are a day ending in day in an inner city or border town.
So, you're saying that NATO is doing this to support the AfD?
You can deport the migrants. Can't deport the Russian military.
Trump thinks we can't walk and chew gum, at the same time.
Religion of Peace 🕊️ LOL
I can see Russia from my house.
mleku @mleku - 2mo
the left-leaning media loves to fuel the anti-gunner rhetoric also, just sayin so the whole world sees this even though it's always in places where normal people can't legally carry guns around, always
europeans and asians already have been disarmed so it's a total false image for people who have been utterly neutered
yeah, it's the same same america: shooting europe: beatings with common household objects or indiscriminate murder with car all the same to me, except it's "america where guns are not easy to get" and that is also an unstated qualifier for europe. oh yeah, you know where in europe this shit doesn't happen btw? balkans gun ownership is not officially easy there but basically half the households have an AK stashed away or at least a makarov, at minimum, probably more like 3/4 in the small towns the criminals don't fuck around in those places, funny that
You should also be aware of the fact that many of the migrants are from Russian territories, and that Russia has the largest Muslim population in Europe. Russia is *more Islamic* than the EU, not less. And the numbers are dramatic, if you just look at the younger generations.
Countries want to be in NATO to protect themselves against Russian invasion. Ukraine wouldn't have been invaded, if it were NATO.
That's like saying locking your house means the thieves have to make a mess breaking the door down, and then they would be all pissed off about the extra effort and might get angry and rape your wife, so it would be better to leave the door open.
Just realized that most of the people on here won't get that reference. Feeling old. 😅
The Greens lost the last election, so the media is allowed to report the news, again.
Places this tends to not happen can be identified by the large white space in this completely random map.
They don't claim, that they just want to be left alone. You're projecting that.
freemymind 🇨🇭 @freemymind 🇨🇭 - 2mo
Do you understand, that correlation and causation are two different concepts. So even when this correlate. It is no proof for a causation. And when the causation is not proofen, based on logic your assumption is simple racism. Even when you created some model to legitimate it.
Islam is not a race. I'm too religious to think that religion doesn't effect behavior. If one thing tends to correllate with another, having more of one will lead to more of the other. There is no need to prove causation. Causation would only tell you why they tend to correllate. I don't actually care, why the correllate.
Also, I don't care, if you think I'm racist. Only people like you worry about whether people think you're racist. I'm okay with some racism, so long as it doesn't reach ridiculous levels. It's just an extended form of familial preference and it's perfectly normal.
No, it's just cultural appropriation. They're learning from what they see around them. They are also seeing that you can do this, claim to be crazy, and not even get jail time.
mleku @mleku - 1mo
the reason anyway is something that i witnessed first hand in prison i got jammed in a remand center holding cell with algerians and moroccans, because one of the moroccans was a professional translator who spoke perfect english i saw these kids, doing their salah and all day long talking about how robbing people and hurting people was Jihad when the people were not muslims that is precisely the mentality that is at play with this, they are constantly bombarded with this rhetoric in their home countries and all the poverty and crime is blamed on the dirty unbelievers, and then they go to the lands of the unbelievers and act like a bunch of gypsy vikings
well, you are ignoring the statistical correlation and obviously have never heard a bunch of little algerian jerk two bit criminal kids talk about how mugging people is jihad i met a guy in prison also who strangled his girlfriend over some fundamentalist dogma on the christian side, the dogma is just saying "this is caused by fundamentalists in their religion promoting violence" and on the other side actual violence being done in the name of wahabism and sunni hadiths the thing is that these "populists" have done some research and/or have seen it playing out in front of their faces like i have.
freemymind 🇨🇭 @freemymind 🇨🇭 - 1mo
Yes. This point I understand and agree. Jihadist defnitly are not to be tolerated. For me tolerance ends, when violence begins. And when I talk about violence I talk about verbal and physical violence. I only argue to have violence as the measure to justify repression. Not the practice of a religion. Because it is a small fraction of muslims that are jihadist. All bigger religions have been legitimation of violence. But the Bases of the big religions have more in common then what they have as differences. The Thora, Bible and Koran are all books, that tell stories of empathy. Of human behaviour as most of us think it should be. Help each other. Go to a muslim country and you will see, that people are warm and always open to receive a guest. But on the streets of a big city many times, well integrated people are not seen, since they are not very different from us. But violent people will always stand out. Those we have to act on. All together. So everyone has the dignity to live in peace.
plenty of anecdotes from listening to sunnis talk about the great war that is part of their hadiths, they see these as acts of war, and they really are if they are happy to do violence to foreigners why don't they go home and pick up AKs and shoot the guys where they came from that are causing the problems?
I do not know why they do not do this. But would not be a better solution. Killing and threatening people is bad. Period.
threatening aggression is not the same as threatening retribution for acts that are being planned to perform these people should be at risk of being shot in the head, on the spot, as they drive their car over innocent people, that's not a threat of aggression, that's a threat of retribution it works, that's why there is almost no street crime in Wyoming - 2/3 of the people are strapped
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/04/26/what-the-data-says-about-gun-deaths-in-the-u-s/ Here would be a source to show gun death by state in the USA. As to answer to your wyoming claim. It is among the top 5 states in death commited with arms.
pew... cited by the best propaganda rags like wapo and nyt it's not even that easy to find real data on this shit because of how much of the commie disarmament of individuals agenda is so heavily funded by USAID and Soros et al before i'm gonna even bother to read such a thing i want to see who pays them to do it same shit with drugs too... almost always corruption just one layer under the surface i know what it looks like in Philadelphia and New York and Los Angeles and Chicago, and all of those famously messed up cities are run by gun grabbing democrats and are riddled with drug addiction and massive scale petty crime
i just think it's obvious that people don't do as much crime if they are at risk of being shot at and if you take away people's guns the bad guys switch from guns to cars and baseball bats
For you this is obvious. For me not. I am quiet certain, that from the core human are constructive. And there are ill people and narcisist, which learned to act different. But it is far from natural for a human to kill an other human being. I look at the numbers. And they seem not to support your claim. So either the numbers or your claim have some issues.
you just don't understand how conditioning and training work i'm a bit surprised but i guess they ended compulsory service in switzerland then?
I know what conditioning can have of effect. But I assume our difference is in a total different aspect. I assume, that any human being is naturally empathic, willing to help others without asking for compensation. That gifting someone is nothing exceptional but rather the norm. And all egoism is something human have to learn from the society. To be selfcentric is something we learn. I base this claim on the reality, that rarely people attack eachother. Even more rare is a physical attack. Most people know, that respecting others property helps securing order in a society. Therefore most people do not steal. I don't see the reason in fear of punishment. But rather in our friendly nature and the understanding that we all profit from friendly behaviour, while everyone looses in a system where the most violent wins. Over the decades humanity always tends to soften more. Every generation tends to be more friendly and less violent. It is natural selction. Survival of the friendliest. You have different beleave there. And I think this is where we differe. The rest is only symptoms of this very basic idea, of what is natural human behaviour.
you are obviously a socialist if you think i want to give you any more of my attention for no reasonable compensation
You are free to point your attention on what you are deciding to.
