ODELL @ODELL - 2y
IF A MINING POOL CENSORS COINJOIN TRANSACTIONS THEN THEY WILL NOT GET MY TRANSACTION FEES OR HASH. IT IS THAT SIMPLE. HAVE FUN STAYING POOR.
𝕼𝖚𝖎𝖊𝖙 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗 @QW - 2y
Does Coinjoin exceed standard 42 bytes? Wonder why Samurai does… 🤔
Bitkorns @Bitkorns - 2y
Turns out, joining a pool that just mines blocks is good.
jabravo @jabravo - 2y
Nobody can censor Bitcoin transactions. Censoring implies that you have enough power to avoid that a transaction can be done. It doesn't exist a pool with enough power to avoid a transaction. I don't see this behaviour as "censoring". It's just an anti-economical behaviour because it would lost fees. If a pool avoids to include a transaction, whatever the reason it is, there are other pools that will bring this transaction into a block. So there are not "censored transactions". Even if many pools censor the same transactions, Bitcoin's free entry allows you to build a mining pool that includes these "censored" transactions, so they are not censored by any means.
Rico @Rico - 2y
Gm
stupleb @stupleb - 2y
Careful when associating with deranged cat-eaters.
Korhag @korhag - 2y
Wait a minute isn’t this guy supposed be a simple bot or sth like that? This was actually very good response :)
