JackTheMimic @JackTheMimic - 1d
You don't debate facts. You debate opinions. As to fungibility you are making a classification error. I can say: "All mammals have a nose." This however does not mean that if an animal has a nose, that it is a mammal. The same goes for money. Many monies have a fungible nature. Not having this feature does not preclude it from being money. However if it is not: Scarce, durable, divisible, verifiable, and portable, it can not be money.
Yeah, I think a lot of people use recognizable instead of verifiable. It just always sat with me as too ambiguous.
