0
0
1

0
0
1

0
0
3

0
1
1

0
0
1

List of things on what’s wrong with Twitter: 1. Technical Glitches: Users report frequent app crashes, slow loading times, and issues with features like tweet embedding, analytics, and ad share accumulation not functioning correctly. 2. Feature Changes: There's dissatisfaction with changes like hiding likes, making it harder to see quote tweets, and the removal or alteration of features that were previously free, now locked behind a paywall. 3. Content Moderation: An increase in unchecked hate speech, misinformation, and racist content has been noted, with many feeling that moderation has decreased or become less effective. 4. User Experience: The overall user experience has been criticized for becoming buggier, with more frequent technical issues than before. 5. Monetization and Algorithm Changes: The introduction of monetization for almost anyone has led to a perceived decline in organic content, with algorithms favoring paid content or features. 6. Branding and Identity: The rebranding from Twitter to X has not been universally welcomed, with some users feeling it lost its unique identity. 7. Advertiser Exodus: There's been a noted decrease in advertisers due to various controversies, which indirectly affects the platform's content and user experience through reduced moderation and development resources. 8. Misinformation and Bots: An increase in misinformation, often amplified by bots, has been a significant concern, with some users feeling that the platform has become a breeding ground for such activities. 9. Community Features: The removal or alteration of community features like tweet circles has been seen as a step back in terms of user interaction and privacy control. 10. General Sentiment: There's a general sentiment of decline in platform quality, with users feeling that the changes have not been for the better, leading to a loss of trust in the platform's direction. Nostr fixed this! #Nostr #GrowNostr #Nostrasia #Introductions

0
1
1

0
0
1

## Devs Alert! Let's try this experiment: I'm going to try to boost productivity of the development of [SatShoot](https://satshoot.com) this way: 1. Will create Tickets in SatShoot pointing to [GitHub issues](https://github.com/Pleb5/satshoot/issues) 2. Share it as kind1 for everyone to see 3. Waiting for aspiring open-source devs to bid on these issues in SatShoot Why not just post bounties you may ask? I don't believe bounties are a good way to incentivize development. You start to work on sth and _hope_ to win the bounty. If you don't win you don't make money, your time is mostly wasted. Only one person or team can win because that's easier to handle for the poster of the bounty. So you don't bother, it's too much risk. You need the precommitment from the job poster but he needs competition to hire the best dev available. This is why contract negotiation works better than bounties. However, you can get the competitive nature of bounties with SatShoot: Everyone interested will bid on the Ticket. You can negotiate with the potential Client in DM and even edit things until you come to agreement BUT ANYONE CAN BID on Tickets as long as they are NOT taken. Competition and contract negotiation. A Ticket in SatShoot is essentially a Request For Quote and an Offer is a Bid or a Quote to solve that problem. I think this model captures best what nostr is about: Open competition in an Unstoppable market fueled by freedom tech. What do you guys think? Let me know and I'll be excited to run this experiment! #satshoot #grownostr

1
3
3

0
0
1

0
0
3

0
1
1

0
1
1

0
0
1

0
2
1

0
1
1

0
1
1

0
1
1

0
0
1

0
0
1

1
2
3

Showing page 1 of 693 pages