PABLOF7z @PABLOF7z - 2y
👀👀👀👀 looking forward to reading it!
NIP-03?
melvincarvalho @Melvin Carvalho - 2y
Not quite. NIP-03 is only half the problem. It is proof of publication. It shows something existed BEFORE a certain block. The next part is solved in something like Peter Todd's "after_btc_block" : "hash". Now you have AFTER and BEFORE, which is a time period. The final part is to repeat this for the next period creating a provable audit trail in time, with continuity. For a global "save game" you would need to pay, depending on how much security you wanted, but we are talking about 1 sat baseline.
semisol @semisol - 2y
The issue is that you can’t trust the after.
Yes you can. Because you cant know a bitcoin hash until after it is created.
Chuck Norris can
The issue is backdating. If you don’t account for that it’s effectively useless.
