Karnage @Karnage - 2y
Looking at Snort dms tonight, if you have any feedback, let me know! 🙇♂️
Carman 🏴☠ @benthecarman - 2y
The unread notification badge never goes away for me
gzuuus @gzuuus - 2y
Same ☝️
0b118 - 2y
I really do love how you think through a user’s way or using it and ease into the designs - the little things like the columns under settings, the donation that’s easy to see but humble, the size and spacing etc - what went from just ok abt a mth back, is now standing out and I absolutely love it 💜🫂
ba948 - 2y
Would be nice to be able to set tae default zap amount?
Yeah I proposed this. Not sure of the status though.
It shows 0 right?
Chris Tavrou @chris_tavrou - 2y
Only this: #[2]
c83b8 - 2y
Not sure but i have siseus with seeing certain posts on damus that i see on iris. And i dont see any responses on iris but i do on damus lol.. bit confusing probably just bugs since this is new 🤔
Yeah
c4f5e - 2y
Does the protocol support reactions in DMs yet?
Kieran @Kieran - 2y
Yes its possible
🤙
3bf0c - 2y
Remove them. Put them on a separate app.
Why don’t it feel that way? Just want a dm-only client?
Do you * dang autocorrect
24daa - 2y
Any possible way of improving nostr dm forward secrecy and/or way of encrypting who you are talking to?
1e9d8 - 2y
I agree! We could make more lightweight clients! Less data, more speed. Less features, the more developed they are. Less features, less bugs. Less features, easier to maintain. E.g: If you have a nostr messenger, you can add encrypted group messages to it as well later. Concentrate on only dm use cases. I like the idea #[3] if you meant this.
ddcb5 - 2y
IMHO, the current NIP-04 DM stuff should be killed with fire. The less integrated it is with other functionality, the better.
aec1f - 2y
I'm a bit late to this note, but some ideas for snort DMs 💡 I'd look into splitting the DM screen into the following tabs; Inbox, Requests and Archived. Inbox - DMs from anyone the user follows. Requests - DMs from anyone the user does not follow. Archive - User archived DMs. I would also investigate a way to have DMing a user who you do not follow require a zap of some sort. The zap requirement for receiving DMs from non-followed users should be able to be set by the user. As for the interface, something like this comes to mind: https://i.nostrimg.com/f7c554678eb26937d860d7d55b8831eeccd2ce7f487baab7ac35e0b44cc3c4d1/file.png CC: #[2]
Not late at all! You always have good ideas!
💜 🫂
02ba8 - 2y
❤
33575 - 2y
DM fee with Request is a great idea. Talk to any woman with even a moderately high profile on Twitter and ask about the DM's they get from randoms. Setting a "4000sat fee to request" would make their experience much nicer.
71bd9 - 2y
Curious about how would you make the zap requirement. I guess it would be just at client level and not at protocol level? Is there a NIP por these?
