Karnage @Karnage - 2y
Looking at Snort dms tonight, if you have any feedback, let me know! 🙇♂️
Carman 🏴☠ @benthecarman - 2y
The unread notification badge never goes away for me
gzuuus @gzuuus - 2y
Same ☝️
0b118 - 2y
I really do love how you think through a user’s way or using it and ease into the designs - the little things like the columns under settings, the donation that’s easy to see but humble, the size and spacing etc - what went from just ok abt a mth back, is now standing out and I absolutely love it 💜🫂
ba948 - 2y
Would be nice to be able to set tae default zap amount?
Yeah I proposed this. Not sure of the status though.
It shows 0 right?
Chris Tavrou @chris_tavrou - 2y
Only this: #[2]
c83b8 - 2y
Not sure but i have siseus with seeing certain posts on damus that i see on iris. And i dont see any responses on iris but i do on damus lol.. bit confusing probably just bugs since this is new 🤔
Yeah
c4f5e - 2y
Does the protocol support reactions in DMs yet?
Kieran @Kieran - 2y
Yes its possible
🤙
3bf0c - 2y
Remove them. Put them on a separate app.
Why don’t it feel that way? Just want a dm-only client?
Do you * dang autocorrect
24daa - 2y
Any possible way of improving nostr dm forward secrecy and/or way of encrypting who you are talking to?
1e9d8 - 2y
I agree! We could make more lightweight clients! Less data, more speed. Less features, the more developed they are. Less features, less bugs. Less features, easier to maintain. E.g: If you have a nostr messenger, you can add encrypted group messages to it as well later. Concentrate on only dm use cases. I like the idea #[3] if you meant this.
ddcb5 - 2y
IMHO, the current NIP-04 DM stuff should be killed with fire. The less integrated it is with other functionality, the better.
aec1f - 2y
I'm a bit late to this note, but some ideas for snort DMs 💡 I'd look into splitting the DM screen into the following tabs; Inbox, Requests and Archived. Inbox - DMs from anyone the user follows. Requests - DMs from anyone the user does not follow. Archive - User archived DMs. I would also investigate a way to have DMing a user who you do not follow require a zap of some sort. The zap requirement for receiving DMs from non-followed users should be able to be set by the user. As for the interface, something like this comes to mind: https://i.nostrimg.com/f7c554678eb26937d860d7d55b8831eeccd2ce7f487baab7ac35e0b44cc3c4d1/file.png CC: #[2]
Not late at all! You always have good ideas!
33575 - 2y
DM fee with Request is a great idea. Talk to any woman with even a moderately high profile on Twitter and ask about the DM's they get from randoms. Setting a "4000sat fee to request" would make their experience much nicer.
That was among one of the sources of inspiration for the idea. And allowing the user to set the zap amount required to receive a DM from an unfollowed account puts the control in the user's hands. And on top of that, it gives us another amazing feature/usage for ⚡ on Nostr.
71bd9 - 2y
Curious about how would you make the zap requirement. I guess it would be just at client level and not at protocol level? Is there a NIP por these?
