Nostr View

Karnage @Karnage - 2y

Looking at Snort dms tonight, if you have any feedback, let me know! πŸ™‡β€β™‚οΈ

0
0
0

Carman πŸ΄β€β˜  @benthecarman - 2y

The unread notification badge never goes away for me

0
0
0

gzuuus @gzuuus - 2y

Same ☝️

0
0
0

0b118 - 2y

I really do love how you think through a user’s way or using it and ease into the designs - the little things like the columns under settings, the donation that’s easy to see but humble, the size and spacing etc - what went from just ok abt a mth back, is now standing out and I absolutely love it πŸ’œπŸ«‚

0
0
0

ba948 - 2y

Would be nice to be able to set tae default zap amount?

0
0
0

Karnage @Karnage - 2y

Yeah I proposed this. Not sure of the status though.

0
0
0

Karnage @Karnage - 2y

It shows 0 right?

0
0
0

Chris Tavrou @chris_tavrou - 2y

Only this: #[2]

0
0
0

c83b8 - 2y

Not sure but i have siseus with seeing certain posts on damus that i see on iris. And i dont see any responses on iris but i do on damus lol.. bit confusing probably just bugs since this is new πŸ€”

0
0
0

Carman πŸ΄β€β˜  @benthecarman - 2y

Yeah

0
0
0

c4f5e - 2y

Does the protocol support reactions in DMs yet?

0
0
0

Kieran @Kieran - 2y

Yes its possible

0
0
0

c4f5e - 2y

πŸ€™

0
0
0

3bf0c - 2y

Remove them. Put them on a separate app.

0
0
0

Karnage @Karnage - 2y

Why don’t it feel that way? Just want a dm-only client?

0
0
0

Karnage @Karnage - 2y

Do you * dang autocorrect

0
0
0

24daa - 2y

Any possible way of improving nostr dm forward secrecy and/or way of encrypting who you are talking to?

0
0
0

1e9d8 - 2y

I agree! We could make more lightweight clients! Less data, more speed. Less features, the more developed they are. Less features, less bugs. Less features, easier to maintain. E.g: If you have a nostr messenger, you can add encrypted group messages to it as well later. Concentrate on only dm use cases. I like the idea #[3] if you meant this.

0
0
0

ddcb5 - 2y

IMHO, the current NIP-04 DM stuff should be killed with fire. The less integrated it is with other functionality, the better.

0
0
0

aec1f - 2y

I'm a bit late to this note, but some ideas for snort DMs πŸ’‘ I'd look into splitting the DM screen into the following tabs; Inbox, Requests and Archived. Inbox - DMs from anyone the user follows. Requests - DMs from anyone the user does not follow. Archive - User archived DMs. I would also investigate a way to have DMing a user who you do not follow require a zap of some sort. The zap requirement for receiving DMs from non-followed users should be able to be set by the user. As for the interface, something like this comes to mind: https://i.nostrimg.com/f7c554678eb26937d860d7d55b8831eeccd2ce7f487baab7ac35e0b44cc3c4d1/file.png CC: #[2]

0
0
0

Karnage @Karnage - 2y

Not late at all! You always have good ideas!

0
0
0

675b8 - 2y

Lol, I just wrote an Issue about it, though (probably due to lack of knowledge) I was less strident πŸ˜‰ https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/issues/270

0
0
0

ddcb5 - 2y

My biggest gripe with NIP-04 is that all DM metadata is public, including sender and recipient: #[5]

0
0
0
Showing page 1 of 1 pages