Nostr View

Peter Todd @Peter Todd - 6d

“100% electric stairs for a green future” Yeah... that jet engine in the background probably puts out more CO2 in a minute than gasoline powered air stairs use in a year. https://image.nostr.build/5c0408ccdc673ca95479e809df51bd5785186a5f9a2fe6461bb139534f15dfec.jpg

0
1
3

Peter Todd @Peter Todd - 6d

I wouldn't be surprised if solar powered air stairs actually save money: being self-refueling you don't have to pay someone to go around with a gas can periodically. And they're probably less maintenance than having an engine. But green? 😂

1
0
3

Peter Todd @Peter Todd - 6d

Huh? No-one uses escalators for air stairs. The purpose of the motor is just to raise the stairs into position to match the height of the plane.

0
0
3

Peter Todd @Peter Todd - 6d

😂😂😂😂

0
0
3

freemymind 🇨🇭 @freemymind 🇨🇭 - 6d

Emissions are always adding up to eachother. So savings in one part is not bad, for the reason, that there is a bigger emitter. Every kg of CO2 that is not emittid is good. But advertising it definitly is greenwashing.

0
0
3

freemymind 🇨🇭 @freemymind 🇨🇭 - 6d

This is a false claim. Prices incentivize economy. Low prices lead to low production, while high prices lead to high production. This force is also independent of your ability to understand. This is most true for goods, that can be stored well. And since fossil fuel can be stored in earth over million of years, the owners can react on prices instantly.

0
0
3

freemymind 🇨🇭 @freemymind 🇨🇭 - 6d

It is very easy. I will explain to you. CO2 is reactive to infrared radiation. Infrared radiation is what transports the biggest amount of energy in the spectrum of solar radiation. Since CO2 reacts to infrared radiation, it increases the temperature on earth. The temperature on earth is naturally tending to create equality of energy entering from space and energy exiting into space. When the amount of CO2 is increased in our atmosphere the absorbtion (storage) of energy within our atmosphere increases. To get a zero sum game again, the atmosphere needs to increase the temperature. This has a massive effect on all species of earth. Species need to mass migrate, to find a space where they find their living conditions in 100 years. Many species do not have the natural ability to migrate in the pace of climate change we have now. Therefore they will extinct. When enough species extinct, ecosystems loose their stability and they tend to collapse. We humain are part of such an ecosystem. We depend on flourishing soil, growing plants, healthy microorganisms and animals in order to survive. Climatechange is threatening this ecosystem of live. Since I want to create better circumstances for my children, then the cirumstances I have, I want to increase stability of ecosystems. Not decrease them.

0
0
3

freemymind 🇨🇭 @freemymind 🇨🇭 - 6d

Exactly. You are my boy. Draw the lines and see how the total consumption decreases, when demand decreases.

0
0
3

freemymind 🇨🇭 @freemymind 🇨🇭 - 6d

I am for stability. Therefore I vote for decentralisation. No single point of failure. ;)

0
0
3

freemymind 🇨🇭 @freemymind 🇨🇭 - 6d

Nope. It does not. Since price is the result. Not the cause. demand / supply => price Price is an indicator of the others. Price is a measurement. You would also not say, that temperature increases because the thermometer is there. It is only a measurment tool.

0
0
3

freemymind 🇨🇭 @freemymind 🇨🇭 - 6d

I would suggest, that we start to understand tendencies. That everyone understands who is in my tribe and who is against my tribe. Everyone should understands, that the #worldisacake, that is constantly growing naturally. Climate change is like posoning parts of this cake, which will slimmer the cake and harm its ability to grow. Dept is an imaginary lie. There is only stealing from the future (eating more, then what is growing). Currently the cake is shrinking. We need to identify the thiefs and put them in chail. Individuals who eat the biggest parts of the cake and poison most cake, are stealing from every individual that lives from this cake. I only argue, that stealing should be ilegalized. And in cases, where it is seen as necessary to eat more, or poison some part, the others should be compensated for it. I am very liberal and exactly for my liberal values, I fight for this.

0
0
3

freemymind 🇨🇭 @freemymind 🇨🇭 - 6d

Define survive. And may give some reasons, why humanity would survive? Human survival is bound to following factors: Adequat supply of food, water and climate below 35°C wet-bulb temperature. Our food sources have other living conditions, depending on the species. But many species have very specific food preferences, that they do not change. (we as human are very flexible in our food consumption) Therefore I also think we have great abilities to adapt and build constructions to help our survival. But with all technology, our survival depends on our food sources. And we have more diverse and better food sources, when we live in a diverse and flourishing ecosystems, then we have in a decreasing ecosystem. When species extinct, they often cause chain reactions of other species that go extinct. And we are one variable in such a chain reaction. I do not know how many species do have to go extinct for humanity going extinct. But I prefer not to put it to the test actually. In the end my measure is well being. And I think we all can agree, that we as human will decrease in well being, when the food-sources decrease. nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzq3ty6ecvc263dsqh8gnczj47tkx2vz4u37yr4jptg76unqy8wjztqyd8wumn8ghj7urewfsk66ty9enxjct5dfskvtnrdakj7qgkwaehxw309ahx7um5wfjkc6t5v4ejummjvuhszxnhwden5te0dehhxarj9e3k2unrv968ymmkvyhx6ef0qqspnmwqkaqk7nmjfj0vjmfw8xdmws8qan6gunxwvvznzl5c54nhsxchcwjp2

0
0
3

freemymind 🇨🇭 @freemymind 🇨🇭 - 5d

Where do you get your information from until now, when you do not know that it is totally threatening all form of live. It is not as if science is holding back any evidence on this. Models are already very bad. But almost every year, they have to lower the expectations of the models, since reality is worse. I think when someone is serious, we have to accept the fact, that for climate there are no frontiers in the world. Therefore every single human being is equal in front of climate change. And when we investigate, which world citizens pollut the world the most it is cristal clear: https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/co2-emissions-per-capita/ And here the list of the 40 countries, with the biggest climate actions in the last 10 years (wow Germany is one place before China): https://247wallst.com/special-report/2021/12/21/the-40-countries-decreasing-emissions-the-fastest/?tpid=1017163&tv=link&tc=in_content

0
0
3
Showing page 1 of 1 pages