Gigi @Gigi - 1y
Follower count is a lie anyway. Maybe nostr:npub1ye5ptcxfyyxl5vjvdjar2ua3f0hynkjzpx552mu5snj3qmx5pzjscpknpr can build this into the #WoT stuff he is currently working on? Quality of connection could be determined by number of interactions, at least in part. Also age of connection, realness of peer, etc. Any additional thoughts from the #SovEng crew? #WebOfTrust
Nothing is impossible, and there will be a DVM for that.
Not only that, but rank your own connections using eigencentrality (or similar). I want to glance at my follows and see the most relevant first, where relevant might be a mix of recent, real, frequent, etc.
Fair. Client diversity and forks of clients will hopefully offer all that. In the end it's filters and should be treated as such. Lots of existing interfaces got this right imho, from app launchers to (old) reddit's comment filtering (new/top/best/controversial).
Niel Liesmons @nielliesmons - 1y
Yup, filter UI's are the best benchmarks for this. #progressivedisclosure Ideally, they wouldn't even be hardcoded and can be discovered (like DVM's).
