JackTheMimic @JackTheMimic - 1d
"Given that non-decreasing demand is not assured the theory is invalid" That's rock solid logic right there, the demand for money will decrease therefore the subjective value of an absolutely scarce money will not sustain. Lol, just let me know when you walk up to a person and ask "Do you want some money?" And they say "Nah, I have enough."
...demand for money is infinite because it's the most saleable good. That should be obvious. Like I said, ask someone if they want some money, they won't refuse.
Money, the class of good, is the most saleable not a specific money... This is like saying Gold isn't money because it isn't the most saleable. I mean, either you are being purposefully obtuse or you don't understand what you are saying.
Okay so, you don't understand the phrase "Money is the most saleable good" It means things that are money are more saleable than nonmonetary goods like soy beans. Money is a classification of goods that are used, not to be consumed but, primarily to be traded for consumable goods and services. This is called monetary premium.
