The Daniel ⚡️ and 84 sats @daniel - 5d
nostr:note1tdhyu0cveth037tllxrhdnsycgm9ju830y3sv0zng93ml3978tqqhpct6u
This is the reason every attempt so far has failed. BCash. BSV. Any other on-chain shitcoin. No measurable retail adoption.
Typical whoever stalks Digit response: “Don’t debate me on the topic, everyone is harassing me!”
Jay @Jay - 5d
Digit is our token retard. Village idiot.
This is actually the same reason that stablecoins on-chain will ultimately fail. If they ever have to scale to the ultimate demands of real mass-adoption, they will be bottlenecked by blockchain limitations and rising transaction (gas) fees. Lightning solves this.
Ah yes…when all else fails, the shitcoins come out!
Or maybe…
node @node - 5d
Except now they don’t need the bank.
For ultimate settlement. Not small payments. This is not a hard concept to understand.
Good for you, buddy. This is why you’re special.
010df - 5d
There is also pphil or pphrank or whatever his name is who goes around telling people Bitcoin will never work.
Damn Bitcoin. Get a job!
Imagine basing your entire online persona around somebody who never wants to hear from you again.
Nah, I’m not going to address all your compounding grievances. That’s what therapy is for.
That’s completely false. Lightning has a unilateral exit on-chain. Ecash and custodial wallets are IOUs, though.
https://thebitcoinmanual.com/articles/unilateral-exit/