thePR0M3TH3AN ✝️ 🥩 🍊 @thePR0M3TH3AN ✝️ 🥩 🍊 - 6d
True: The creators of any particular AI tool (or search engines, websites, books...) influence its outputs through design decisions, training data selection, and fine tuning. If the training data is common and reliable, the model's responses will be more cohesive and factual. Distortions or biases in the data harm the models testing and user performance. This is why early #woke AI models like Google's suck and as they removed those perspectives and guardrails, the models performance improved. Its still nowhere near as good as OpenAI but you see the point.
thePR0M3TH3AN ✝️ 🥩 🍊 @thePR0M3TH3AN ✝️ 🥩 🍊 - 5d
There are literally hundreds of AI models made by various companies and open source projects that anyone can use. It's no different than a book, website or search engine. If you don't like the answer then use a different tool. The references in the Deep Research article that I generated were extremely thorough. So yes, I do trust that comprehensive research over your assertion against Mullvad.
